<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IVF Archives - MyMedicPlus</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.mymedicplus.com/blog/tag/ivf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.mymedicplus.com/blog/tag/ivf/</link>
	<description>One Blog Daily For Health And Fitness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2022 09:22:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Scotland&#8217;s IVF treatment is the &#8216;gold standard&#8217;, say fertility experts</title>
		<link>https://www.mymedicplus.com/blog/scotlands-ivf-treatment-is-the-gold-standard-say-fertility-experts/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mymedicplus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2020 06:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy & Fertility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fertility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gold standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IVF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treatment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mymedicplus.com/news/?p=6540</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://www.mymedicplus.com/blog/scotlands-ivf-treatment-is-the-gold-standard-say-fertility-experts/">Scotland&#8217;s IVF treatment is the &#8216;gold standard&#8217;, say fertility experts</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.mymedicplus.com/blog">MyMedicPlus</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[


<p>Source &#8211; https://www.heraldscotland.com/</p>
<p class="article-first-paragraph">SCOTLAND leads the UK in NHS-funded IVF treatment and it is a frustration that there is “no willingness” by the UK Government to achieve the same level of service south of the Border, a London-based fertility expert has said.</p>
<p>Sarah Norcross, director of the Progress Educational Trust, which campaigns to improve access to treatment, praised the Scottish Government for the gradual, sustained improvements that she said had led to the country providing a “gold standard” service.</p>
<div id="subscription-content">
<p>In Scotland, women under 40 can have three funded rounds of IVF treatment and one between the ages of 40 and 42, if all the relevant criteria is fulfilled. </p>
<div id="inArticleAd-1" class="advert-container">
<div id="DFP_in_article_mpu" data-google-query-id="CMj7kZvWqe0CFQChSwUd6YgO5g">
<div id="google_ads_iframe_/154725070/www.heraldscotland.com/news_2__container__"> </div>
</div>
</div>
<p>In England, treatment varies widely because there are more than 200 commissioning centres, while in Wales only one round is funded.</p>
<p>The success rate is also higher in Scotland. For women under the age of 38, the live birth rate is 34 per cent per embryo, compared to 29% across the UK while there are fewer multiple births, which can post risks for both mother and baby.</p>
<p>Ms Norcross said couples and single women are more likely to pay for treatment in England, while NHS treatment is also more likely to be outsourced to private clinics.</p>
<p>She said part of the reason for Scotland’s higher success rate is because there is greater sharing of “best practice” between the four NHS centres in Glasgow, Edinburgh, Aberdeen and Dundee. </p>
<p>“In Scotland it’s as good as it gets,” said Ms Norcross.</p>
<p>“It is so frustrating there is not the willingness to do this in England. I think there are political reasons for that but I don&#8217;t really want to say anymore &#8211; it&#8217;s not going to do my cause any good.</p>
<p>“There is great collaboration between the four NHS centres in Scotland in Edinburgh, Glasgow, Aberdeen and Dundee and a drive to share good practice.</p>
<p>“If you are a private business you keep your best practices to yourself.</p>
<div id="inArticleAd-2" class="advert-container">
<div id="DFP_in_article_2" data-google-query-id="CMn7kZvWqe0CFQChSwUd6YgO5g">
<div id="google_ads_iframe_/154725070/www.heraldscotland.com/news_3__container__"> </div>
</div>
</div>
<p>“In Wales and Northern Ireland treatment is centrally commissioned, like it is in Scotland, but they are not as generous – you can have up to two in Northern Ireland and in Wales it’s just one.</p>
<p>“It’s not just great provision (in Scotland) but the provision in the NHS is really good quality. Going on the regulator’s latest figures, the live birth rate is 28% per embryo transferred for all women in Scotland, whereas it’s only 23% across the UK.</p>
<p><strong>READ MORE:</strong> <em>Legacy of Glasgow ultrasound pioneer continues with new technology that will make Scotland a leader in fetal medicine </em></p>
<p>“If you split down the age range – if you are looking at women under the age of 38 – the UK average is 29%, whereas in Scotland it is 34%.</p>
<p>“Scotland is also ahead of the game in reducing multiple births. There is a drive to cut down on the numbers of twins and triplets because it’s not good for mum and it’s not good for baby.</p>
<p>“In Scotland the average is only 6% of multiple births, whereas across the UK is 8% and the target that was set by the regulator is 10% so Scotland is way ahead of the target.”</p>
<p>Around 60% of couples in Scotland access fertility treatment through the NHS, while in England that figure stands at around 40%.</p>
<p>“But even if people are getting it on the NHS in England, it might be done in a private centre, where in Scotland that model is avoided,” said Ms Norcross.</p>
<p>“There has been a real willingness by the Scottish Government to fund this and to recognise that fertility treatment is an essential part of the health service and that they should work towards the implementation of the NICE guidelines that were brought in.</p>
<p><strong>READ MORE:</strong> <em>Scotland&#8217;s IVF centres given approval to open in a &#8216;safe and timely way&#8217; </em></p>
<p>“They took a really responsible approach I think in that they knew they couldn’t achieve it overnight without having other knock-on effects to the health service.”</p>
<p>The charity leader also hailed the opening of a new centralised NHS facility, near Edinburgh, which aims to improve the process of egg and sperm donation in Scotland and will act as a national storage facility. </p>
<p>The Jack Copeland Centre, near Edinburgh, is also a base for the Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service. A national donor drive was due to take place this year but has been postponed due to the pandemic. </p>
<p>“It is an issue that needs to be kept in the public awareness because it’s not something that’s in the public’s awareness in the same way as blood donation.”</p>
<p>Women are offered around £700 to donate eggs while men receive around £35 per donation &#8211; Ms Norcross said the process is generally motivated by altruism.</p>
<p>She said the goal for the future in terms of fertility treatment should be improving access for those who would like a second child and to improve access for single woman and men.<br />“Single men do come forward but it’s obviously incredibly difficult because they have to use surrogacy which is complicated <br />and expensive.”</p>
<div id="inArticleAd-4" class="advert-container">
<div id="DFP_in_article_4" data-google-query-id="CMv7kZvWqe0CFQChSwUd6YgO5g">
<div id="google_ads_iframe_/154725070/www.heraldscotland.com/news_5__container__"> </div>
</div>
</div>
<p>A spokesman for the UK Government said: “Earlier this year the Health and Social Care Secretary committed to reviewing IVF equality to ensure all couples get equal access.”</p>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.mymedicplus.com/blog/scotlands-ivf-treatment-is-the-gold-standard-say-fertility-experts/">Scotland&#8217;s IVF treatment is the &#8216;gold standard&#8217;, say fertility experts</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.mymedicplus.com/blog">MyMedicPlus</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Choosing surgery or IVF in the treatment of infertility in endometriosis</title>
		<link>https://www.mymedicplus.com/blog/choosing-surgery-or-ivf-in-the-treatment-of-infertility-in-endometriosis/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mymedicplus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 06:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Endometriosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infertility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IVF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treatment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mymedicplus.com/news/?p=4694</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://www.mymedicplus.com/blog/choosing-surgery-or-ivf-in-the-treatment-of-infertility-in-endometriosis/">Choosing surgery or IVF in the treatment of infertility in endometriosis</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.mymedicplus.com/blog">MyMedicPlus</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Source: focusonreproduction.eu</p>
<p class="jss303 jss311 jss323 jss320 jss207">Surgery or ART? A dearth of strong evidence reported at Campus meeting to favour specific infertility treatments in cases of endometriosis.</p>
<div class="jss303 jss312 jss320 jss208">
<p>Which is preferable in the clinical management of infertility associated with endometriosis? Surgical or medical treatment such as IVF? Given the lack of randomised control trial data, this remains a dilemma in determining good practice. So, the take-home message from this January Campus meeting on endometriosis and infertility, organised by SIG Endometriosis &amp; Endometrial Disorders, was that shared decision-making remains the best approach to ensure the wishes of the patient are respected fully.<br /><br />Ying Cheong from the University of Southampton set out the pros and cons of IVF and surgery. Thus, while excision may be the only option for some women (IVF is not effective in severe endometriosis), surgery can neither prevent disease recurrence (51% reoperation rate) nor restore fertility. Her verdict was that neither IVF nor surgery is better, and decision-making has to be case by case. ‘What’s suitable for one person, may be unsuitable for another,’ she said.<br /><br />A recurring question raised throughout this Campus was how a variation in surgical skills might affect outcomes. Could ablation be the solution? Massimo Candiani, from Milan, argued that ablation and laser techniques have improved &#8211; such that, for example, surgeons can now navigate more efficiently around the cyst. His research on CO2 fibre laser ablation has described the technique as a promising method to treat endometriomas while preserving ovarian function.(1) A small study found no statistical difference in endometriosis recurrence rates and is now being followed up with a prospective study on thermal effect post treatment.(2)<br /><br />One significant challenge is identifying who needs ART following surgery. A strong case was made by Carla Tomassetti from Leuven for extending use of the endometriosis fertility index (EFI), which is a free tool now validated worldwide for postoperative fertility management. Endometriosis does not equal a need for ART, she argued. Instead, careful patient selection is necessary and EFI might be used as a &#8216;triage instrument&#8217; to select patients for surgery or ART. However, Dr Tomassetti, a past co-ordinator of the SIG Endometriosis, added that there is still insufficient evidence to recommend laparoscopy before ART, or long downregulation with GnRH agonists.<br /><br />Successful implantation is another major challenge in endometriosis cases. Velja Mijatovic from UMC Amsterdam, in emphasising past data showing that endometriosis affects multiple aspects of the reproductive cycle, from oocyte quality to embryogenesis and the receptivity of the endometrium, reported that the protein-coding gene BCL6 is now proving to be a promising biomarker for identifying impaired endometrial receptivity. He outlined findings suggesting that BCL6 overexpression is associated with adverse IVF outcomes and that patients with BCL6 overexpression may benefit from both surgical and medical treatment.<br /><br />The enigmatic nature of endometriosis makes management of disease subtypes particularly challenging. For example, very little is known about the exact relationship between infertility and adenomyosis, with no RCT evidence available. Edgardo Somigliana described the relationship between adenomyosis, endometriosis and pregnancy as &#8216;complex&#8217;. The lack of quality evidence, he said, means that no firm guidance can be given on current treatment options (surgery, hormonal therapy, or treatments to reduce inflammation). The little evidence that does exist must be taken into consideration, he said, as well as the cost and safety (surgery complications) of a treatment. This approach was echoed by Ludovico Muzii, from Sapienza University of Rome, for colorectal endometriosis for which excisional surgery may not be as effective (weaker link with infertility than other subtypes). ‘The emphasis must be protecting the patient, such as not taking away the entire ovary,’ he said.<br /><br />One emerging theory that could one day lead to new therapies for endometriosis is the role of the vaginal microbiome, with a hypothesis that micro-organisms may trigger the immune system to produce an inflammatory response in the endometrium. In his plenary lecture, Baris Ata from Istanbul presented his own research, which found differences between the microbiota (genus level) of women with moderate to severe endometriosis and controls.(3) For example, Streptococcus sp levels were increased in those with the disease, with similar results in a systematic review published last year (eg, increased Streptococcus and proteobacteria in endometriosis patients).(4) Although worth further research, the microbiome theory was described by Ata as a ‘chicken-and-egg situation’ because it is unclear whether endometriosis affects the microbiome, or vice versa. And any meaningful results will take years to produce.<br /><br />One way forward in solving the mysteries of endometriosis could be through future studies of populations that are phenotypically homogeneous. This approach has already revolutionised clinical practice in oncology, as SIG co-ordinator Andrea Romano pointed out. It may also lead to breakthroughs in managing infertility in endometriosis patients.</p>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.mymedicplus.com/blog/choosing-surgery-or-ivf-in-the-treatment-of-infertility-in-endometriosis/">Choosing surgery or IVF in the treatment of infertility in endometriosis</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.mymedicplus.com/blog">MyMedicPlus</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The US fertility rate has hit an all-time low, and delayed childbirth is only partially to blame</title>
		<link>https://www.mymedicplus.com/blog/the-us-fertility-rate-has-hit-an-all-time-low-and-delayed-childbirth-is-only-partially-to-blame/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mymedicplus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2020 06:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy & Fertility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth rate US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fertility rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fertility rate US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IVF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mymedicplus.com/news/?p=4093</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The post <a href="https://www.mymedicplus.com/blog/the-us-fertility-rate-has-hit-an-all-time-low-and-delayed-childbirth-is-only-partially-to-blame/">The US fertility rate has hit an all-time low, and delayed childbirth is only partially to blame</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.mymedicplus.com/blog">MyMedicPlus</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Source: insider.com</p>
<p>American women are having fewer children than ever before, a trend some medical experts have attributed to delayed child rearing. Others disagree and say the drop is due to stifling socio-economic factors, including rising childcare costs and a lack of supportive government programs for working mothers.</p>
<p>The US&#8217; total fertility rate, the number of children a woman is expected to have in her lifetime, hit a record low in 2018, according to a new report released on Friday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).</p>
<p>That year, the average woman in the US was projected to have a total of 1.7 children in her lifetime. In order for the current generation to replace itself, women need to have at least two. Since 2008, fertility rates have dipped below that level, according to the CDC.</p>
<h3>Fertility rates may be falling due to delayed childbirth and financial factors</h3>
<p>Medical and economic experts are divided as to why fertility rates have been declining consistently.</p>
<p>Some experts in reproductive medicine say the drops are largely due to women waiting to get pregnant and being unable to have a baby once they decide they&#8217;re ready.</p>
<p>But some economic experts disagree, and say many women have no choice but to have fewer children than they thought they would, or no children, because of stifling financial factors, and the fact that there aren&#8217;t sufficient government programs to support mothers.</p>
<p>&#8220;Economic instability and unaffordable care could be factors for people deciding to have children later in life, or not at all,&#8221; Josie Kalipeni, policy director of Caring Across Generations, a healthcare advocacy campaign, told the Atlantic last year.</p>
<p><br />But even with major advances in assisted reproductive technology, some medical experts think that women can&#8217;t afford to wait much longer than past generations typically did to have children.</p>
<p>Dr. Eve Feinberg, associate professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Northwestern University, has joined that camp of experts.</p>
<p>She told Insider last year that part of the reason why fertility rates have declined is because there&#8217;s misinformation around the efficacy of assisted reproductive technology, and that women of advanced reproductive age often expect more from treatments, including in-vitro fertilization, than they can actually offer.</p>
<p>&#8220;People overestimate the success of fertility treatment,&#8221; Feinberg told Insider last year. &#8220;While it is successful, it has limitations at older ages.&#8221;</p>
<h3>After 35, a woman&#8217;s chances of getting pregnant through IVF drops</h3>
<p>Women younger than 35 have a 21.3% chance of getting pregnant using assisted reproductive technology, and having a full-term baby of normal weight, according to a 2015 CDC report. But those numbers steadily drop as women get older. After 35, a woman&#8217;s chances decline to 17% and after 38, it&#8217;s 11%.</p>
<p>Despite those figures, some population experts disagree with Feinberg and say that the falling fertility rate isn&#8217;t a reflection of a risky waiting game. Rather, the data snapshot isn&#8217;t able to accurately capture the true trend, which is that women aren&#8217;t having fewer children, they&#8217;re just having them when they&#8217;re older.</p>
<p>&#8220;The women are going to have children, just later in life,&#8221; Alison Gemmill, assistant professor of population, family, and reproductive health at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, told ABC News.</p>
<h3>In 2018, birth rates increased for women 35 and older, and dropped for all other age groups</h3>
<p>From 2010 to 2018, the birth rate, or number of live babies born in a year, increased by 14.6% among women who were 35 to 39, according to the CDC. Over that same period, the birth rate increased by 15.7% for women between the ages of 40 and 44. Birth rates for teenagers and women in their 20s steadily declined.</p>
<p>But many women often have no choice but to put off motherhood, considering what the alternative could look like for them.</p>
<p>The number of mothers who work outside the home has dramatically increased over the past few decades. Despite these sharp increases, women are often penalized at work once they become mothers, and at the same time, they can&#8217;t rely on government programs, like subsidized childcare, for help.</p>
<p>In 2018, 65% of US mothers with children under 6 were employed, up from 39% in 1975, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.</p>
<h3>The &#8216;motherhood penalty&#8217; costs women about $16,000 a year in wages after they become mothers</h3>
<p>Still, the US remains the only developed country in the world that does not have mandated paid maternity leave. Once a woman has a child in the US, she&#8217;s likely to suffer the &#8220;motherhood penalty,&#8221; which could translate to losing $16,000 annually in wages, according to the National Women&#8217;s Law Center. Childless women can expect their income to remain on pace with that of men&#8217;s earnings.</p>
<p>While pregnancy discrimination, a form of employment discrimination, was outlawed in 1978, many women say the practice is still rampant. That means women will get passed over for promotions while pregnant, or that managers will unabashedly ask about a woman&#8217;s plans to have children during a job interview.</p>
<p>No mother, from hourly-wage server as a restaurant to a top level finance executive, is safe from pregnancy discrimination or pushback after having a baby, research shows.</p>
<p>When Erin Murphy, a senior employee at finance firm Glencore, was eight months pregnant, she approached her boss about her future at the company. He was quick to dismiss her.</p>
<p>&#8220;You&#8217;re old and having babies,&#8221; Murphy told the New York Times last year of how her boss reacted, &#8220;so there&#8217;s nowhere for you to go.&#8221;</p>


<p>The post <a href="https://www.mymedicplus.com/blog/the-us-fertility-rate-has-hit-an-all-time-low-and-delayed-childbirth-is-only-partially-to-blame/">The US fertility rate has hit an all-time low, and delayed childbirth is only partially to blame</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.mymedicplus.com/blog">MyMedicPlus</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
