Catheter securement device: Uses, Safety, Operation, and top Manufacturers & Suppliers

Introduction

A Catheter securement device is a purpose-built medical device designed to stabilize a catheter and its associated tubing at (or near) the insertion site. In day-to-day hospital operations, securement is often treated as a “small consumable,” yet it can have outsized impact on catheter stability, patient comfort, and the reliability of infusion or drainage therapy.

For clinicians, the practical goal is straightforward: keep the catheter in the intended position with minimal movement and minimal skin injury. For hospital administrators, procurement teams, and biomedical engineers, the goal is broader: standardize practice, reduce avoidable catheter complications, support infection prevention workflows, and ensure supply continuity across wards, ICUs, emergency departments, and outpatient settings.

This article provides general, non-prescriptive information on uses, safety considerations, basic operation, troubleshooting, cleaning principles, and a global market overview for Catheter securement device solutions. It is not medical advice and does not replace your facility’s policies, clinical judgment, or the manufacturer’s Instructions for Use (IFU). Device features, change intervals, and compatibility vary by manufacturer.

What is Catheter securement device and why do we use it?

A Catheter securement device is a category of hospital equipment that mechanically and/or adhesively anchors a catheter to help prevent movement, migration, kinking, and accidental dislodgement. It is distinct from (but often used alongside) a dressing, which primarily protects the insertion site and supports a barrier to contamination.

Definition and purpose (what it does in practice)

At a practical level, a Catheter securement device aims to:

• Stabilize the catheter hub and tubing so routine patient movement does not translate into micro-motion at the insertion site
• Reduce tension on the line (especially from extension sets, connectors, and infusion tubing)
• Support consistent site access for inspection and maintenance, depending on design
• Standardize securement compared with ad hoc taping practices

Securement approaches commonly encountered include:

• Sutureless securement devices with an adhesive base and a locking mechanism (clip, strap, or hinged retainer)
• Adhesive anchor pads and stabilization platforms, sometimes integrated with a transparent dressing
• Tape-based securement, still used in some settings but highly variable and technique-dependent
• Straps or leg securement systems commonly used for urinary catheters and some drainage tubing
• Integrated catheter systems where the catheter hub includes design features intended to assist stabilization (often still used with separate securement)

Not every product in this category is sterile, single-use, or intended for the same catheter type. Always confirm the IFU for intended use, skin prep compatibility, and dwell/change expectations.

Common clinical settings

You will see Catheter securement device use wherever catheters are placed and expected to remain functional beyond brief, supervised procedures. Common settings include:

• Emergency departments (high turnover, frequent line starts, rapid patient movement)
• Intensive care units (multiple infusions, high line density, frequent repositioning)
• Operating rooms and post-anesthesia care (short-to-medium dwell, high handling)
• Oncology and infusion centers (longer dwell vascular access, high therapy dependence)
• Dialysis and interventional services (high-value access, strict site management)
• General wards and step-down units (mobility and ambulation are routine)
• Home care and outpatient environments (less continuous supervision, higher reliance on stable securement)

Key benefits in patient care and workflow (why hospitals invest)

When selected and used appropriately, Catheter securement device solutions can support:

• Fewer avoidable line disruptions (e.g., accidental pulls, partial dislodgement, or kink-related occlusions)
• More predictable maintenance routines by standardizing how lines are stabilized and labeled
• Improved staff efficiency (less “re-taping,” fewer urgent line restarts, clearer inspection points)
• Better alignment with infection prevention practices, especially when securement supports clean site access and consistent dressing integrity
• Reduced reliance on sutures for certain catheter types, where clinically appropriate and consistent with policy

From an operations standpoint, securement also affects:

• Consumable spend (unit price plus change frequency)
• Training burden (standard work, competency checks, and onboarding)
• Waste streams (single-use plastics, packaging volume)
• Supply chain resilience (multiple SKUs, substitutions, and product equivalence decisions)

When should I use Catheter securement device (and when should I not)?

Appropriate use is primarily determined by: the catheter type, expected dwell time, patient mobility, skin integrity, and your facility protocol. The sections below provide general guidance only; contraindications and warnings vary by manufacturer.

Appropriate use cases (common scenarios)

A Catheter securement device is commonly considered when:

• The catheter is intended to remain in place for ongoing infusion, monitoring, or drainage
• The patient is expected to mobilize, transfer frequently, or is at risk of inadvertently pulling on tubing
• There are multiple connected components (needleless connectors, extension tubing, stopcocks) that can increase mechanical leverage
• The clinical team needs consistent, inspectable securement rather than variable taping
• Securement needs to be sutureless as part of facility policy or patient-specific considerations

Common catheter/tubing scenarios include:

• Peripheral IV catheters and midlines (securement may reduce movement and kinking)
• PICCs and other central venous catheters (stabilization and consistent dressing integrity are operational priorities)
• Arterial lines (line stability is important because of monitoring and frequent handling)
• Urinary catheters (leg straps or adhesive anchors to reduce traction on the urethra)
• Certain drainage catheters or tubing systems (securement to reduce traction at the site)

When it may not be suitable (or needs an alternative approach)

A Catheter securement device may be unsuitable or require an alternative product/technique when:

• The patient has fragile skin, skin tears, or dermatologic conditions where standard adhesives increase injury risk
• There is known or suspected sensitivity to adhesives, barrier films, or device materials (e.g., acrylic adhesives, latex—materials vary by manufacturer)
• The intended placement area is wet, heavily diaphoretic, oily, or unable to remain dry (adhesion performance may be compromised)
• The catheter location or configuration does not allow the device to sit flat without tenting, wrinkling, or tension
• The securement device would cover needed visualization points or interfere with other medical equipment
• A specialty catheter system has a proprietary hub geometry or dressing requirement (compatibility varies by manufacturer)

In some contexts, a different securement strategy may be selected, such as a silicone-based adhesive product, a non-adhesive retention system, or a strap-based approach—depending on your protocol and the patient’s skin condition.

Safety cautions and contraindications (general, non-clinical)

General cautions relevant to many securement systems:

• Do not apply over broken, infected, or severely irritated skin unless permitted by protocol and IFU.
• Avoid creating excess tension on the catheter; securement should stabilize, not pull.
• Avoid circumferential constriction with straps (e.g., around limbs) that could impair circulation; check fit regularly.
• Ensure the device does not create pressure points under rigid components, especially in patients with edema or limited sensation.
• Do not “improvise” modifications (cutting, re-gluing, re-sterilizing) unless the IFU explicitly permits it.
• If the packaging is damaged, sterility is uncertain, or the lot/expiry cannot be verified, do not use.

What do I need before starting?

Successful securement is usually less about the product alone and more about standardized preparation, staff competency, and consistent documentation.

Required setup, environment, and accessories

Typical items required (exact requirements vary by manufacturer and facility policy):

• Appropriate Catheter securement device (correct size/type for the catheter and location)
• Dressing supplies as indicated (transparent film dressing, gauze dressing, or integrated dressing system)
• Skin antiseptic supplies per protocol (and adequate drying time)
• Clean gloves; sterile gloves where required by procedure and policy
• Barrier film (optional, protocol-dependent; compatibility varies by manufacturer)
• Adhesive remover (use per policy; compatibility varies by manufacturer)
• Clippers for hair management (avoid shaving unless policy specifies otherwise)
• Labels/marker for date/time and line identification (protocol-dependent)
• Secure tubing management accessories as needed (extension set stabilization, line organizers)

Environmental considerations:

• Adequate lighting for site visualization
• A clean workspace with controlled interruptions
• Patient positioning that minimizes tension on the catheter during application
• Privacy and dignity measures, especially for urinary catheter securement

Training and competency expectations

Because securement sits at the intersection of infection prevention, skin integrity, and line reliability, most facilities benefit from structured competency, including:

• Understanding catheter types and where the securement device should sit relative to the insertion site
• Skin prep technique (cleaning, drying, hair management, barrier film use)
• Correct engagement of the locking mechanism (where applicable)
• Safe removal to reduce skin trauma
• Documentation practices (external length, device type, date/time, condition of site)
• Recognition of failure modes (lifting edges, moisture accumulation, device creep, catheter migration)

For hospital administrators and educators, it is useful to treat securement as a standard work item: teach it the same way across units, audit it, and reduce variation.

Pre-use checks and documentation

Before opening and applying the device, common checks include:

• Confirm correct product selection for catheter type and patient location
• Inspect packaging integrity (no tears, punctures, moisture exposure)
• Check expiry date and storage conditions (temperature/humidity limits vary by manufacturer)
• Verify size/format (adult vs pediatric, limb vs chest, hub geometry)
• Confirm sterility status if labeled sterile (do not assume)
• Ensure all needed accessories are available to avoid mid-procedure interruptions

Documentation commonly captured (often in the vascular access or device management section of the chart):

• Catheter type, site, and date/time of securement application
• Securement product name/type (and sometimes lot number or UDI, depending on policy)
• External catheter length or reference mark (where relevant)
• Site assessment findings (skin integrity, dressing condition)
• Patient tolerance and any adhesive-related issues

How do I use it correctly (basic operation)?

There are multiple designs of Catheter securement device products. The workflow below describes a general, brand-neutral approach. Always follow your facility protocol and the manufacturer IFU.

Basic step-by-step workflow (general)

1. Confirm the plan and compatibility
   Verify the catheter type, securement method, and dressing approach required by protocol.

2. Perform hand hygiene and prepare supplies
   Set up a clean field. Minimize interruptions.

3. Position the patient and manage tubing slack
   Ensure the catheter and tubing are supported so that the site is not under tension during application.

4. Assess skin and placement area
   Look for fragile skin, irritation, moisture, hair density, or locations where the device cannot sit flat.

5. Clean and dry the skin per protocol
   Allow antiseptics to dry completely; adhesion is commonly compromised on damp skin.

6. Hair management (if needed)
   Clip hair rather than shaving where policy supports this; hair can prevent full contact and cause painful removal.

7. Apply barrier film (if used)
   Use only products compatible with the securement adhesive; compatibility varies by manufacturer. Allow to dry.

8. Apply the securement base/anchor
   Place the adhesive base without tension or wrinkles. Press firmly using the manufacturer’s recommended technique and time.

9. Engage the catheter in the locking mechanism (if present)
   Ensure the hub is seated correctly. Close the retainer/clip/strap fully. Avoid forcing components.

10. Add the dressing (if separate)
    Apply a transparent film dressing or other dressing as required, keeping the insertion site visible when appropriate and consistent with policy.

11. Route and secure the tubing
    Create a gentle loop to absorb tugging forces. Prevent kinks near the hub and avoid heavy connectors pulling on the site.

12. Label and document
    Apply date/time labels if used. Document external length/marking as required.

13. Reassess line function and site visibility
    Confirm that the device does not obstruct required assessment points and that the line can be used as intended.

Setup, calibration, and “settings” (what applies here)

Most Catheter securement device products:

• Do not require calibration
• Do not have electronic settings
• Rely on correct sizing, correct placement, and correct adhesive bonding

However, there are operational variables to standardize:

• Device size and model (matched to catheter hub and patient anatomy)
• Skin prep method (antiseptic type, drying time, barrier film use)
• Dressing approach (integrated vs separate dressing)
• Change interval (varies by manufacturer and facility protocol; often aligned with dressing change routines)
• Removal technique (to reduce skin trauma)

Typical wear and change considerations (general)

Change intervals for securement devices and dressings vary by manufacturer and are often influenced by:

• Dressing integrity (edge lift, moisture, contamination)
• Skin condition (irritation, blistering, maceration)
• Patient activity level and perspiration
• Type of catheter and expected dwell time
• Facility infection prevention policy

Operationally, many facilities align securement checks with routine line assessment rounds and align full replacements with dressing changes, but the exact schedule should be defined by your protocol and the IFU.

How do I keep the patient safe?

Patient safety with Catheter securement device use is primarily about skin protection, catheter stability, and reliable line access—delivered through consistent practice and vigilant monitoring.

Safety practices and monitoring

Common safety practices include:

• Routine inspection of the insertion site, dressing integrity, and securement stability at intervals defined by protocol
• Checking for catheter migration using external length markings or reference points (where applicable)
• Monitoring skin integrity under and around adhesives for early signs of irritation, blistering, or skin stripping
• Ensuring tubing slack to avoid traction forces during turning, mobilization, or transport
• Preventing kinks by avoiding sharp bends at or near the hub and ensuring connectors are supported
• Maintaining visibility of key assessment points (as allowed by the dressing and device design)
• Reducing unnecessary manipulation (each handling event can stress the adhesive bond and increase contamination risk)

For urinary catheter securement, safety monitoring often emphasizes:

• Avoiding tension on the catheter during ambulation
• Ensuring straps are not too tight and are rechecked after movement or edema changes
• Keeping tubing routed to reduce snagging during transfers

Alarm handling and human factors (what securement influences)

A Catheter securement device does not typically generate alarms, but it can influence other equipment behaviors:

• Infusion pump occlusion alarms may occur if tubing is kinked or pulled at the hub due to poor securement or poor tubing routing.
• Frequent downstream occlusion alarms can become “normalized,” increasing the risk that staff silence alarms without addressing the underlying mechanical issue.
• A standardized securement method reduces variability between staff and shifts, supporting safer handoffs and fewer “mystery fixes” (extra tape layers, hidden connectors, or inaccessible clamps).

Human factors to consider in policy and training:

• Standardize where to place the securement device relative to the insertion site
• Standardize how to create and secure a tubing loop
• Ensure labels do not cover visibility points
• Ensure removal is taught explicitly (slow, supported, with appropriate adhesive remover if used)

Emphasize facility protocols and manufacturer guidance

Because adhesives, materials, and locking mechanisms differ:

• Follow the manufacturer IFU for skin prep compatibility, dwell/change guidance, and removal technique.
• Follow facility protocols for line assessment, dressing change frequency, and escalation criteria.
• When substitutions occur due to supply constraints, treat them as a change in process: update training, validate compatibility, and monitor outcomes.

How do I interpret the output?

In contrast to electronic clinical devices, a Catheter securement device usually does not provide numeric output. The “output” is physical and observational: whether the catheter is stable, the site remains visible/clean, and the dressing and securement remain intact.

Types of outputs/readings (what you can observe and document)

Typical observable “outputs” include:

• Securement integrity
  Adhesive fully bonded, edges sealed, locking mechanism fully closed, no device creep.

• Catheter position indicators
  External catheter length, reference marks, hub position relative to skin, and whether the catheter appears to have migrated.

• Dressing condition
  Clean, dry, intact; no lifting edges; no visible fluid accumulation; no trapped moisture.

• Skin response
  Redness, blanching, blistering, maceration, rash, or skin stripping at the adhesive border.

• Functional indicators (indirect)
  Line flush/infusion behavior, frequency of occlusion alarms, leakage at the hub, and patient-reported discomfort.

How clinicians typically interpret these observations

Across many facilities, common interpretations include:

• External length change may indicate migration and should trigger assessment per protocol.
• Repeated edge lift or moisture suggests the securement/dressing system is failing under the current conditions (sweat, location, activity) and may require a different product or technique.
• Skin irritation suggests the adhesive choice, barrier film approach, or removal technique may need adjustment (and may require an alternative product).
• Frequent pump alarms can signal a mechanical issue at the hub or tubing routing rather than a pump malfunction.

Common pitfalls and limitations

• Assuming “looks secure” equals “is secure” without checking the lock engagement and tubing tension
• Covering key inspection points with extra tape, making it harder to assess the site
• Measuring external catheter length inconsistently (different reference points between staff)
• Over-tightening straps (especially urinary catheter straps), creating pressure injury risk
• Forgetting that adhesion performance changes with moisture, skin oils, lotions, and repeated manipulation

What if something goes wrong?

Problems with Catheter securement device performance are usually process-related (skin prep, placement, tension management) or product-selection-related (wrong size/type, incompatible materials), but true device defects can also occur.

Troubleshooting checklist (frontline-friendly)

Use a structured approach:

• If the device will not stick
• Confirm skin is fully dry and free of oils/lotions
• Confirm antiseptic and barrier film are fully dry
• Check if hair is preventing contact
• Confirm the product is within expiry and stored correctly

• Consider moisture-management and alternate adhesives (varies by manufacturer)

• If the securement is sticking but the catheter still migrates

• Check that the hub is correctly seated in the retainer
• Confirm the retainer is fully closed/locked
• Reduce tension by re-routing tubing and adding a slack loop

• Confirm you are using the correct device size for the catheter hub

• If you see kinking or frequent infusion alarms

• Inspect tubing path for sharp bends near the hub
• Ensure connectors are supported and not “hanging”

• Verify the securement device is not forcing the hub into an angled position

• If the patient reports pain or you see skin injury

• Inspect under edges if possible without contaminating the site
• Follow protocol for removal and reapplication

• Consider alternative materials or non-adhesive options (varies by manufacturer)

• If the dressing is wet, loose, or contaminated

• Treat it as a dressing integrity failure per protocol
• Replace using aseptic technique and document findings

When to stop use (general)

Stop using the current securement approach and escalate per policy when:

• The catheter has visibly dislodged, migrated significantly, or is no longer functioning as intended
• There is significant skin injury (blistering, tearing, or severe irritation) attributable to the securement system
• The securement device repeatedly fails within a short period despite correct application
• The securement method prevents required site assessment or interferes with other critical care tasks
• You suspect a product defect or compromised sterility

When to escalate to biomedical engineering, procurement, or the manufacturer

While Catheter securement device products are typically low-tech, escalation pathways still matter:

• Biomedical/clinical engineering may support evaluation of repeated failures across units, storage condition assessments, incident investigations, and standardization initiatives (especially when securement interacts with infusion device alarms and tubing setups).
• Procurement and supply chain should be involved when substitutions are being made, when a product change is proposed, or when lot-related performance concerns arise.
• The manufacturer should be contacted for suspected defects (broken retainers, inconsistent adhesion, packaging integrity issues), adverse events, or questions on compatibility and IFU interpretation. Information on complaint handling and reporting processes is typically included in product documentation; details are not publicly stated for some private-label arrangements.

Infection control and cleaning of Catheter securement device

Infection control for Catheter securement device use is less about “cleaning the device” and more about aseptic technique, dressing integrity, and minimizing contamination during handling. Many securement products are single-use and not intended to be reprocessed.

Cleaning principles (what applies in most hospitals)

General principles include:

• Treat sterile, single-use securement devices as disposable; do not attempt to wash, disinfect, or re-sterilize unless the IFU explicitly allows it.
• Perform hand hygiene before and after any contact with the catheter site, securement, or dressing.
• Disinfect needleless connectors and access points per protocol; securement can reduce line movement but does not replace hub hygiene.
• Avoid unnecessary lifting of dressing edges or partial re-adherence, which can compromise the barrier.

Disinfection vs. sterilization (general)

• Sterilization is a manufacturing and packaging state for many securement products; end users generally do not sterilize these items.
• Disinfection may apply to non-sterile accessories (for example, reusable external tubing organizers or non-sterile straps) if your facility uses them. Whether disinfection is appropriate depends on the product’s intended use and IFU.
• Reprocessing rules vary widely by jurisdiction and facility. If a product is labeled single-use, reprocessing may be prohibited or tightly regulated.

High-touch points to pay attention to

Even when the securement device is single-use, staff frequently touch adjacent surfaces during routine care:

• The catheter hub and any stabilization clip area
• Extension sets, clamps, stopcocks, and needleless connectors
• Dressing edges (where lifting and re-pressing commonly happens)
• Tubing loops and anchoring points that are adjusted during mobilization
• Leg straps and adjustment points for urinary catheter securement

Example cleaning and change workflow (non-brand-specific)

A general, protocol-driven workflow might include:

1. Prepare supplies and perform hand hygiene.
2. Put on gloves and expose the site while maintaining privacy and warmth.
3. Assess dressing and securement integrity; note moisture, lifting, or contamination.
4. Remove the dressing/securement using the IFU-recommended technique (often “low and slow”), supporting the skin to reduce injury.
5. Dispose of single-use components in the correct waste stream.
6. Cleanse the skin and insertion site per protocol; allow full drying time.
7. Apply a new Catheter securement device and dressing using aseptic technique.
8. Label and document date/time, site condition, and any concerns (including skin reaction).
9. Re-route tubing and confirm no tension or kinks.
10. Perform hand hygiene and complete documentation in the clinical record.

Medical Device Companies & OEMs

Healthcare leaders often use “manufacturer” as a catch-all term, but the medical device industry includes multiple production models that affect quality systems, traceability, and support.

Manufacturer vs. OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer)

• A manufacturer (often the brand owner) typically defines product requirements, holds regulatory registrations/clearances where required, manages labeling, and is responsible for post-market surveillance and complaint handling.
• An OEM may design and/or produce components (adhesives, molded parts, films) or manufacture the final device under contract. In some cases, the OEM produces a product that is private-labeled by multiple brands.

For Catheter securement device products, OEM involvement can include:

• Adhesive formulation and coating processes
• Injection-molded clips/retainers and mechanical parts
• Packaging/sterilization services (where applicable)
• Kitting (bundling securement with dressings or catheter kits)

How OEM relationships impact quality, support, and service

From a hospital operations viewpoint, OEM structures can influence:

• Consistency between lots (especially for adhesives and films)
• Change control transparency (material changes may not be obvious to end users)
• Recall management and traceability (UDI/lot tracking becomes important)
• Training and IFU clarity, particularly when the same “core” product appears under different labels
• Service responsiveness (complaints may route through the brand owner even when manufacturing is outsourced)

Top 5 World Best Medical Device Companies / Manufacturers

Because comprehensive, device-specific rankings require verified sources, the following are example industry leaders commonly recognized for broad portfolios in medical equipment, vascular access, dressings, and related consumables. Availability of a specific Catheter securement device product varies by manufacturer and region.

1. 3M
   3M is widely known for medical consumables, including dressings, tapes, and skin protection products used in acute care. Its healthcare offerings often intersect with catheter site management, where securement and dressing integrity are operational priorities. The company has a global footprint with products commonly seen across hospital and outpatient settings. Specific securement device models and regional availability vary by manufacturer distribution strategies.

2. Becton, Dickinson and Company (BD)
   BD is a major supplier in vascular access, infusion therapy, and medication management ecosystems. In many hospitals, BD products interface directly with catheter maintenance workflows, where stabilization and securement are part of reliable therapy delivery. BD operates globally and supports large-scale procurement structures, though exact securement offerings and branding can vary by market.

3. B. Braun
   B. Braun is well established in infusion therapy, vascular access, and surgical products, with broad international operations. Hospitals often encounter its product families in standardized infusion setups, where catheter securement is a routine operational requirement. The company’s portfolio approach is relevant to procurement teams looking for system compatibility across catheters, connectors, and consumables. Securement device availability varies by country and tender arrangements.

4. Teleflex
   Teleflex supplies a range of devices across anesthesia, vascular access, and interventional care. In many regions, its products are present in procedural and critical care environments, where dependable line management and stabilization are important. Teleflex has multinational operations, but the specific securement solutions offered can differ by region and clinical segment.

5. ICU Medical
   ICU Medical is known for infusion-focused products, including components that support safe infusion delivery and line management. In facilities where infusion standardization is a priority, securement is often evaluated as part of the broader tubing, connector, and catheter workflow. Global footprint and product availability vary, especially where portfolios change through acquisitions or regional distribution agreements.

Vendors, Suppliers, and Distributors

Even the best Catheter securement device cannot deliver value if it is unavailable, substituted without training, or supported poorly during recalls and quality events. Understanding commercial roles helps healthcare systems structure contracts and accountability.

Role differences: vendor vs. supplier vs. distributor

• A vendor is the commercial entity that sells to the healthcare provider. Vendors may be manufacturers, distributors, or resellers.
• A supplier is a broader term for any organization providing goods or services; it can include manufacturers, importers, and distributors.
• A distributor typically holds inventory, manages warehousing and transport, supports order fulfillment, and may provide value-added services like kitting and consignment.

For hospital procurement and operations, these roles affect:

• Lead times and fill rates
• Management of substitutions and backorders
• Recall communication and lot traceability
• Onsite support for product conversion, training, and evaluations
• Contracting models (tenders, framework agreements, GPO participation)

Top 5 World Best Vendors / Suppliers / Distributors

As with manufacturers, “best” is context-specific and requires verified, region-specific data. The organizations below are example global distributors commonly known in healthcare supply chains. Their presence and service scope vary by country.

1. McKesson
   McKesson is a large healthcare distribution and services organization, particularly prominent in North America. Many hospitals rely on such distributors for consistent replenishment of consumables like securement products, dressings, and related medical equipment. Service offerings often include logistics, inventory programs, and procurement support, though specific capabilities vary by contract and region.

2. Cardinal Health
   Cardinal Health is commonly associated with broad medical-surgical distribution and supply chain services. For catheter care consumables, distributors in this category may support standardization efforts by ensuring SKU stability and managing product conversions. Distribution reach and value-added programs vary by market and buyer profile.

3. Medline
   Medline is known for distributing a wide range of hospital equipment and consumables, and in some markets also offers private-label products. For procurement teams, such vendors can be relevant where bundled contracting, clinician training support, or procedure kits are part of the securement workflow. Availability and regional focus vary.

4. Henry Schein
   Henry Schein is widely recognized in healthcare distribution, with strong presence in dental and also medical segments in various regions. Depending on the market, distributors with mixed clinical portfolios may supply securement products to outpatient centers, clinics, and some hospital departments. The breadth of catheter-focused offerings varies by country and business unit.

5. Owens & Minor
   Owens & Minor is associated with healthcare logistics, distribution, and supply chain solutions in certain markets. Organizations in this category often support hospitals with standardized consumables purchasing and may assist with inventory optimization. Specific geographic footprint and service models vary.

Global Market Snapshot by Country

India

Demand for Catheter securement device products is driven by high patient volumes, expanding private hospital networks, and growing attention to standardization in ICUs and emergency care. Price sensitivity is a major procurement factor, so hospitals often evaluate multiple brands and product tiers. Access and training can vary significantly between major urban centers and smaller district facilities, with many consumables still reliant on imports or metro-based distribution.

China

China has substantial domestic manufacturing capacity for medical equipment, alongside ongoing demand for international brands in higher-tier hospitals. Volume-based procurement mechanisms and centralized purchasing can influence pricing and SKU availability, shaping how securement products are standardized. Urban tertiary hospitals typically adopt more engineered securement approaches, while rural and lower-tier facilities may have more variable practice and supply access.

United States

The United States market emphasizes standardization, quality metrics, and supply reliability, with Catheter securement device selection often linked to broader vascular access and infusion therapy programs. Group purchasing organizations and integrated delivery networks influence contracting and product conversions. Training support and post-market surveillance processes are relatively mature, though product substitution during shortages remains an operational risk.

Indonesia

Indonesia’s archipelagic geography makes distribution and consistent availability a key challenge for consumables like securement devices. Demand is rising with hospital expansion and ICU capacity growth, but many facilities remain import-dependent for branded clinical devices. Urban centers (especially major islands and cities) tend to have stronger service ecosystems than remote regions, affecting standardization and training reach.

Pakistan

In Pakistan, procurement is often constrained by budget limits in public facilities, with variable access across provinces and between urban and rural hospitals. Import dependence for many consumables can create availability fluctuations, making substitutions common. Private hospitals in major cities may adopt more standardized securement practices, while smaller facilities may rely more on tape-based methods due to cost and supply variability.

Nigeria

Nigeria’s market is shaped by import dependence, uneven distribution networks, and significant differences between urban private hospitals and under-resourced public facilities. Catheter securement device adoption tends to track where infusion therapy volumes are high and where training and governance programs are stronger. Currency fluctuations and logistics constraints can affect continuity of supply and consistent product standardization.

Brazil

Brazil has a sizable healthcare market with both public (SUS) and private sectors, and regulatory oversight that shapes import and local manufacturing pathways. Demand for securement products is supported by large hospital networks and increasing focus on standardization in complex care. Regional disparities remain, with stronger availability and service in major urban corridors compared with remote areas.

Bangladesh

Bangladesh’s demand is driven by high patient volume and expanding hospital services, but procurement is frequently constrained by cost and reliance on imports. In larger urban hospitals, standardization and training are more achievable, supporting consistent use of securement solutions. Rural facilities may face more variability in product availability and may use simpler fixation methods when engineered devices are unavailable.

Russia

Russia’s market dynamics are influenced by domestic manufacturing policies, changing import conditions, and regional variability in procurement capacity. Large urban hospitals are more likely to maintain standardized consumables portfolios, including engineered securement products, where supply permits. In more remote areas, service ecosystem limitations and supply continuity can affect consistent adoption.

Mexico

Mexico has a large healthcare system with a mix of public institutions and a significant private sector, both of which influence procurement models for consumables. Demand for Catheter securement device products is supported by high procedural volumes and expanding hospital infrastructure in major cities. Import reliance remains important for many branded consumables, and distribution reach can vary across regions.

Ethiopia

Ethiopia’s market is characterized by developing healthcare infrastructure, constrained budgets, and reliance on donor-supported procurement in some settings. Access to engineered securement products can be limited outside major urban hospitals, affecting standardization. Training capacity and supply chain consistency are key determinants of adoption for catheter-related consumables.

Japan

Japan’s healthcare environment places strong emphasis on product quality, standardization, and clinical governance, supporting consistent adoption of engineered consumables where they fit protocols. An aging population and high utilization of hospital services contribute to ongoing demand for reliable catheter management systems. Cost containment pressures exist, but supply chains and service ecosystems are generally robust in urban and regional centers.

Philippines

The Philippines market blends public and private provision, with strong demand in major urban hospitals and variable access across islands. Many consumables, including securement devices, can be import-dependent, making distributor capability a critical factor. Training and standardization may be stronger in large private hospitals, while resource constraints can affect practice consistency in smaller facilities.

Egypt

Egypt’s large population and expanding healthcare delivery create steady demand for catheter care consumables, including securement products. Procurement may occur through large tenders in public systems, while private hospitals may have more flexibility in product selection. Availability and standardization can differ between major cities and more rural governorates, influencing training reach and consistent use.

Democratic Republic of the Congo

The DRC faces significant infrastructure and logistics challenges that affect reliable access to consumables and clinical devices. Many facilities depend on imports and, in some areas, humanitarian supply channels, which can lead to product variability. Urban centers may have better access to standardized securement products, while rural regions often face severe constraints in both supply and training.

Vietnam

Vietnam’s healthcare market has been expanding, with increasing investment in hospitals and greater attention to standardization in urban centers. Many securement products remain import-reliant, but local distribution networks are strengthening. Differences between tertiary urban hospitals and provincial facilities can influence product availability, staff training, and the degree of protocol-driven securement adoption.

Iran

Iran’s market is shaped by domestic production capacity and varying constraints on imports, which can affect product choice and continuity of supply. Hospitals may rely on locally available alternatives for securement, with variability in features and materials depending on the manufacturer. Urban centers generally have stronger procurement and service capabilities than remote regions.

Turkey

Turkey has an established medical manufacturing and distribution ecosystem, with a mix of domestic production and imports supporting hospital consumables. Demand for Catheter securement device products is supported by large hospital networks and a strong private sector, including high-volume urban facilities. Tender processes and price pressures influence standardization, but distribution and training support are relatively developed in major regions.

Germany

Germany’s market is characterized by structured procurement, strong regulatory expectations, and mature infection prevention and clinical governance practices. Hospitals often prioritize standardization and traceability for consumables, which supports consistent adoption of engineered securement solutions when aligned with protocols. Access is generally strong across regions, though purchasing decisions are influenced by hospital groups and cost-effectiveness assessments.

Thailand

Thailand’s demand is supported by expanding hospital capacity, strong private healthcare presence, and medical tourism in major cities. Many advanced consumables are imported, making distributor strength and inventory planning important for continuity. Urban hospitals typically have better training infrastructure and product availability than rural facilities, influencing how consistently securement protocols are implemented.

Key Takeaways and Practical Checklist for Catheter securement device

• Treat Catheter securement device selection as a clinical-standardization decision, not just a consumable purchase.
• Match the securement device design to the catheter hub geometry and intended location.
• Confirm whether the securement product is sterile, single-use, and intended for the catheter type.
• Build a short list of approved alternatives to manage shortages without unsafe improvisation.
• Standardize skin preparation steps because adhesion failure is often a process issue.
• Ensure antiseptics and barrier films are fully dry before applying adhesive products.
• Clip hair when needed to improve adhesion and reduce painful removal; avoid ad hoc shaving where possible.
• Avoid applying securement under tension; stabilization should not pull the catheter.
• Route tubing with a slack loop to absorb tugging forces during patient movement.
• Support heavy connectors so they do not torque the catheter hub.
• Confirm the locking mechanism is fully engaged after placement (if the design includes a lock).
• Keep key assessment points visible as required by protocol and dressing design.
• Label date/time and line identification consistently to improve handoffs and audits.
• Document external catheter length or reference marks when your protocol requires it.
• Inspect securement integrity at routine intervals, not only when alarms occur.
• Respond to repeated infusion occlusion alarms by checking tubing routing and hub angle.
• Monitor skin under and around adhesives for early signs of irritation or blistering.
• Use removal techniques that minimize skin trauma; follow the IFU for adhesive removal guidance.
• Consider patient mobility and agitation risk when selecting securement style and tubing routing.
• For urinary catheter straps, avoid circumferential tightness and recheck fit after repositioning.
• Treat wet, loose, or contaminated dressings as an integrity failure and manage per protocol.
• Do not reprocess single-use securement products unless the IFU explicitly permits it.
• Track lot/UDI information where required to support recall readiness and incident investigation.
• Include securement technique in onboarding and annual competency refreshers.
• Audit securement practice the same way you audit line maintenance and dressing compliance.
• Plan conversion training when changing brands, because “similar looking” devices can operate differently.
• In procurement, evaluate total cost of ownership: unit price plus change frequency plus failure rates.
• Include clinician feedback in evaluations, especially regarding skin outcomes and ease of inspection.
• Confirm compatibility between securement adhesives and any barrier films used in your facility.
• Verify storage conditions across wards to avoid heat/humidity exposure that can degrade adhesives.
• Create clear escalation pathways for suspected product defects and repeated performance issues.
• Avoid covering securement systems with extra tape that hides inspection points or traps moisture.
• Standardize where the securement device is placed relative to the insertion site to reduce variation.
• Use consistent measurement reference points for external length to avoid misinterpretation between shifts.
• Coordinate securement and dressing changes with planned care bundles to reduce unnecessary manipulation.
• Ensure distributors can support consistent SKU supply and provide documentation for substitutions.
• Maintain a small stock buffer for high-use units (ED/ICU) to reduce forced substitutions.
• Incorporate securement considerations into patient transport checklists to prevent accidental dislodgement.
• Treat skin injury events associated with adhesives as reportable quality signals, not “expected” outcomes.
• For multi-site hospitals, align formularies to reduce training burden and cross-site practice variation.
• When evaluating new products, run time-limited pilots with clear success criteria and audit measures.

If you are looking for contributions and suggestion for this content please drop an email to info@mymedicplus.com