Endoscopy suction pump: Uses, Safety, Operation, and top Manufacturers & Suppliers

Posted on February 27, 2026 | by drjosehph

Table of Contents

Introduction

An Endoscopy suction pump is a powered vacuum source used to remove fluids, debris, and gas through endoscopic suction channels and connected aspiration tubing. In practical terms, it helps teams maintain a clear field of view and a controlled working environment during diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy across multiple specialties.

For hospital administrators, clinicians, biomedical engineers, and procurement teams, this medical device matters because suction performance is directly tied to procedural flow, staff workload, infection control risk, and equipment uptime. A weak, inconsistent, or poorly maintained suction setup can disrupt schedules, increase turnaround times, and raise safety and contamination concerns.

Endoscopy suction pumps also sit in a “high-dependency” zone of the procedure room workflow: they are often needed at unpredictable moments (sudden fluid load, rapid irrigation, secretion management, or a blocked channel), and failure typically requires immediate mitigation. That makes this device category different from many other room peripherals—its reliability is judged not only by whether it turns on, but by how quickly it achieves usable suction and how stable that suction remains under variable loads.

Facilities may treat suction as “infrastructure” (wall vacuum) or as “equipment” (portable pump). In reality, many endoscopy units use a hybrid approach: central suction as the primary source, plus a dedicated pump for rooms with weaker wall vacuum, for redundancy during high-acuity cases, or to standardize performance across rooms with different engineering histories. Procurement and biomedical teams often find that standardization decisions (one model vs multiple) have downstream effects on staff training, stocking of liners/filters/tubing, and service responsiveness.

This article provides general, non-clinical guidance on what an Endoscopy suction pump is, where it is commonly used, and how to approach safe operation, troubleshooting, and cleaning. It also outlines practical purchasing and support considerations, explains manufacturer vs. OEM relationships, and offers a globally aware market snapshot to help operations leaders plan for service coverage and supply continuity.

What is Endoscopy suction pump and why do we use it?

An Endoscopy suction pump is medical equipment designed to generate adjustable negative pressure (vacuum) for aspiration during endoscopy. The pump typically connects to a collection canister (or liner system) and then to patient-side suction tubing and/or the endoscope’s suction channel. Many units include a vacuum gauge or digital display, safety overflow protection, and filtration to help protect the pump and the environment from contamination.

From an engineering perspective, most endoscopy suction pumps use an internal vacuum-generating mechanism (commonly diaphragm, piston, or rotary vane designs) driven by an electric motor. While users experience the device as “suction,” performance is better understood as a combination of vacuum level (negative pressure) and flow rate (how much air/fluid can be moved over time). Endoscopy workflows often benefit from a pump that can maintain stable vacuum while also delivering enough flow to handle transient peaks (for example, clearing fluid quickly after irrigation).

Many modern units also incorporate features that support safer operation and easier room turnover, such as:

Integrated regulators that maintain the selected vacuum as system conditions change
Overflow shut-off (float valve) designs intended to reduce fluid entry into the vacuum line
Hydrophobic and/or bacterial filtration to protect the pump and reduce contamination risk
Digital controls and self-tests on some models, which can simplify pre-use verification
Multiple canister options, including disposable liners, reusable jars, or quick-change canister holders

For buyers and biomedical teams, it can be helpful to distinguish between “endoscopy-optimized” suction pumps and general-purpose portable suction units. Endoscopy-oriented devices may emphasize quick setup, stability under intermittent suction, easy-to-clean surfaces, quiet operation for procedure-room communication, and compatibility with common endoscopy consumable ecosystems.

Core purpose

The primary purpose is to provide reliable, controllable suction that supports endoscopic visualization and procedural efficiency. During endoscopy, fluid and debris can obscure the lens and working field; suction helps restore visibility and supports tasks such as clearing secretions, removing irrigation fluid, and decompressing gas when required by local practice.

In addition to visibility, suction supports the overall “fluid management loop” in endoscopy. Endoscopic procedures often involve cycles of irrigation (introducing fluid) and aspiration (removing fluid). If aspiration cannot keep pace, the team may experience delayed progress, increased instrument exchanges, more frequent scope removal for cleaning, and longer room occupancy. For operations leaders tracking throughput, suction performance can be a hidden contributor to list overruns and avoidable delays.

Common clinical settings

Endoscopy suction pumps are commonly found in:

GI endoscopy suites (upper GI endoscopy, colonoscopy, ERCP support workflows)
Bronchoscopy and respiratory procedure rooms
ENT endoscopy and outpatient procedure clinics
Operating rooms where endoscopic and minimally invasive procedures occur
ICU or emergency settings for bedside endoscopic procedures (varies by facility capability and protocols)
Ambulatory surgery centers and specialty clinics where portability and fast turnover are priorities

In many facilities, suction pumps may also be deployed in multi-purpose procedure rooms that handle mixed case types across a day (for example, bronchoscopy in the morning and GI in the afternoon). In those environments, teams often value pumps that can be rapidly reconfigured (tubing lengths, canister sizes, mounting options) without increasing error risk.

Whether a facility uses a dedicated Endoscopy suction pump or relies on central (wall) suction varies by manufacturer options, room design, and local engineering standards. Some departments choose a pump specifically to address known central vacuum limitations (variable performance between rooms, shared suction loads, or older infrastructure), while others choose it mainly for redundancy and standardization.

Key benefits for patient care and workflow (general)

Benefits can include:

Consistent suction performance compared with variable wall suction in some facilities
Fine control of vacuum to match procedure type and institutional protocols (settings vary by manufacturer)
Portability and flexibility, supporting rooms without reliable wall vacuum or for mobile procedure setups
Closed collection systems (canister/liner + filtration) that can simplify waste handling and reduce spillage risk when used correctly
Operational resilience, where a pump can serve as a backup if central suction is unavailable (subject to local policies)

Additional workflow benefits that operations teams often notice over time include:

Predictable room setup: standardized pump + standard tubing/canister sets reduce “room-to-room differences” that can slow staff rotation
Faster troubleshooting: dedicated pumps with clear indicators can help staff identify whether the issue is the endoscope channel, tubing, filter, or wall vacuum
Reduced cross-department dependency: when central vacuum issues occur, endoscopy lists may continue with less disruption if pumps are available
Better consumable traceability: liners and filters can be tracked by room, list, or case type to support inventory planning and quality audits

For healthcare operations leaders, the device is also a workflow tool: it influences room readiness, turnover time, consumable management (liners, filters, tubing), and biomedical maintenance load.

When should I use Endoscopy suction pump (and when should I not)?

Use of an Endoscopy suction pump should be aligned with the device’s intended use, the procedure environment, and facility protocols. The following guidance is informational and not a substitute for manufacturer instructions for use (IFU) or local clinical governance.

A practical way to think about “when to use” is to consider three drivers:

Clinical workflow need (how often suction is required, and how quickly it must respond)
Infrastructure reliability (whether wall suction is consistent and validated in that room)
Risk tolerance and contingency planning (whether the procedure environment demands immediate backup)

Appropriate use cases (general)

An Endoscopy suction pump is typically appropriate when:

Endoscopic procedures require active aspiration to maintain visibility and manage fluids
A room lacks adequate or reliable central vacuum infrastructure
A mobile or temporary procedure setup needs self-contained suction
The facility needs standardized suction performance across multiple procedure rooms
A backup suction source is required as part of risk planning (subject to facility policy)

In high-throughput units, pumps are often used even when wall suction exists, simply because performance consistency reduces small delays that compound across a list. In addition, some sites prefer pumps because they can be paired with a standardized canister/liner system that aligns with infection control and waste handling pathways.

Situations where it may not be suitable

It may be inappropriate or inefficient to use an Endoscopy suction pump when:

The procedure does not require suction, or suction is infrequent and central suction is already validated and sufficient
The device is being considered for a use case outside its IFU (for example, uses that require specialized vacuum regulation, fluid handling, or hazardous substance control)
Power supply is unstable and the pump has no suitable battery backup (varies by manufacturer), and no reliable contingency plan exists
Noise, heat output, or footprint constraints in the procedure room create safety or ergonomic issues that cannot be mitigated

Additional operational scenarios that can make pump use less suitable include:

Rooms with strict equipment space limits where adding a pump increases crowding around the procedure table, creating trip hazards or limiting emergency access
Settings with limited consumable availability (filters/liners) where a pump-dependent workflow could increase risk of unsafe reuse or improvised setups
Environments requiring special electrical controls (for example, where extension leads are frequently used) that raise electrical safety concerns unless properly managed

Safety cautions and contraindications (general, non-clinical)

Common non-clinical cautions include:

Do not use a damaged device (cracked canister, compromised seals, damaged power cord, missing filter, or abnormal noises/smells).
Avoid operating without recommended filtration/overflow protection if specified in the IFU; liquid ingress can damage the pump and create contamination hazards.
Do not exceed facility-defined limits for suction use; vacuum level selection and technique should follow clinician training and local protocols.
Do not bypass alarms or safety shut-offs. If an alarm occurs repeatedly, treat it as a system condition, not “background noise.”
Do not use unapproved accessories (tubing, liners, canisters, filters) unless verified compatible. Fit and leakage performance can vary by manufacturer.
Do not use in restricted environments where the IFU prohibits operation (for example, certain MRI zones or specific hazardous atmospheres). This varies by manufacturer and local safety rules.

Additional common-sense operational cautions include:

Do not overfill collection containers beyond the marked maximum; overfilling increases spill risk and can trigger overflow protection at inconvenient times.
Do not block ventilation openings or place the pump against drapes or walls that restrict airflow; overheating can reduce performance and shorten device life.
Avoid improvised electrical setups (daisy-chained adapters, damaged extension cords); suction pumps are often used continuously and may draw more current than small peripherals.
Secure the canister and tubing before the patient is moved or the bed is repositioned; many spills occur during transfers rather than during suction itself.

From a governance standpoint, the “contraindication” is often operational: if the suction pathway cannot be kept clean, sealed, and traceable—or if staff are not trained—then the device should not be used until those controls are in place.

What do I need before starting?

Before first use (and before each case), a structured setup and readiness approach reduces avoidable failures. Administrators and biomedical teams can treat this as a clinical device readiness bundle: environment + accessories + competency + documentation.

A readiness mindset is particularly important because suction issues may not show up until the moment suction is demanded. A pump that “sounds normal” can still underperform if a filter is saturated, a lid gasket is mis-seated, a canister is cracked, or tubing is loosely fitted.

Required setup and environment

Typical requirements include:

Stable placement on a cart or surface that prevents tipping and allows clear access to controls
Ventilation clearance around intake/exhaust vents (varies by manufacturer)
Reliable power (grounded outlet per local electrical standards); confirm compatibility with local voltage/frequency
Cable and tubing management to reduce trip hazards and prevent line disconnection during patient movement
Backup suction plan, often central suction or a second pump, depending on procedure risk and facility policy

Additional environment considerations that many sites build into standard work include:

Locked cart wheels/brakes if the pump is on a trolley, to prevent drift during the case
Clear separation from wet zones (sink splash, floor cleaning water) to reduce electrical and contamination risk
Visibility: positioning the gauge/display and canister where the operator can see both without turning away from the procedure field
Power-circuit awareness: if multiple high-load devices share one outlet bank, nuisance breaker trips can occur; facilities may label outlets intended for pumps

Common accessories and consumables

Accessories vary by manufacturer, but commonly include:

Collection canister or canister + disposable liner
Canister lid with ports and shut-off/float mechanism (design varies)
Hydrophobic/bacterial filter (often placed in the vacuum line to protect the pump)
Vacuum tubing (pump-to-canister) and patient suction tubing (canister-to-endoscope/handpiece)
Optional footswitch or remote control (varies by model)
Brackets, holders, and connectors required for secure mounting and leak-free connections

Depending on facility waste handling policy, some endoscopy units also use:

Solidifier/gel agents (or pre-solidified liners) to reduce splash risk during disposal
Spare canisters/liners staged in-room for irrigation-heavy lists where a mid-case change may be needed
Y-connectors or adapters (only when approved) to support dual suction lines, acknowledging that shared suction can reduce effective flow

For procurement teams, confirm which items are included at purchase and which are ongoing consumables. Total cost of ownership is often driven by disposables and service, not only the initial unit price.

A practical purchasing tip is to request a “per-case consumables map” during evaluation: which items are always used, which are optional, and which are replaced per case vs per day vs per incident (for example, wet filter). This helps forecast both cost and storage needs.

Training and competency expectations

A safe program typically defines competency for:

Clinical staff: correct assembly, vacuum selection per protocol, alarm response, and safe shutdown
Reprocessing/housekeeping staff: cleaning responsibilities for external surfaces and handling of suction waste
Biomedical engineers/technicians: preventive maintenance (PM), functional verification, leakage checks, and repair pathways

Competency should be documented and refreshed when models change or when incident trends suggest retraining is needed.

Many units also benefit from identifying “super users” (experienced nurses/techs) who receive deeper training on accessory compatibility, alarm interpretation, and first-line troubleshooting. This reduces the burden on biomedical engineering for minor issues and helps standardize practice across shifts.

Pre-use checks and documentation

A practical pre-use check (often 60–90 seconds) can include:

Verify the device ID matches the room’s equipment list and maintenance status (PM label, service date).
Confirm the canister/liner is correctly seated, not cracked, and below fill level.
Check that all tubing is fully seated, not kinked, and appropriately routed.
Confirm the filter is present and correctly oriented (directional filters are common; varies by manufacturer).
Power on and verify self-test (if available) and that the vacuum gauge/display responds.
Perform a basic functional test: occlude patient-side tubing briefly to confirm vacuum rises and stabilizes at the selected setting.
Record checks per facility policy (paper checklist or electronic log), especially in high-throughput endoscopy units.

Additional quick checks that can prevent “mystery failures” include:

Inspect lid gasket/seal surfaces for dried residue or deformation that can cause slow leaks.
Confirm the canister is properly latched in its holder, especially on mobile carts that may have been moved between rooms.
Listen for abnormal sounds (new rattling, grinding, or rhythmic cycling) that can indicate internal wear or a blocked exhaust path.
Check for signs of prior fluid intrusion (staining near vacuum ports, damp filters, moisture in tubing) and quarantine the device if suspected.

How do I use it correctly (basic operation)?

Basic operation should follow the manufacturer IFU and facility protocols. The workflow below is a general, brand-neutral outline intended to support standardization and training.

A useful operational principle is to treat suction as a system, not a box. Performance depends on the pump, canister, lid seal, filter, tubing length/diameter, connectors, and the endoscope’s suction valve and channel condition. Standardizing these components—and how they are assembled—often matters as much as the pump’s maximum vacuum rating.

Basic step-by-step workflow (general)

Prepare the room – Position the Endoscopy suction pump so controls and canister are visible and accessible. – Ensure cables and tubing will not interfere with staff movement or patient transfer. – If using a cart, set brakes and confirm the pump cannot roll during bed repositioning.
Assemble the collection system – Install the canister or liner and secure the lid. – Confirm the overflow shut-off/float mechanism is present (design varies by manufacturer). – If your facility labels suction waste by case/time, apply labels before the case begins to reduce handling later.
Install filtration (if required) – Place the recommended hydrophobic/bacterial filter in the vacuum line per IFU. – Avoid reusing single-use filters; performance and resistance can change once wet. – If the system uses multiple filters (for example, protective filter plus secondary filter), ensure both are installed in the correct locations.
Connect tubing – Connect pump-to-canister tubing to the vacuum port. – Connect canister-to-patient/endoscope suction tubing to the patient port. – Ensure all connections are firm to reduce leaks and loss of vacuum. – Route tubing to minimize sharp bends and “pinch points” under wheels, bed rails, or footstools.
Power on and verify readiness – Plug into a suitable outlet and switch on. – Confirm the unit completes any self-check and displays normal status (varies by manufacturer). – For portable/battery-capable units, confirm the charging/AC indicator behaves as expected.
Set vacuum level – Adjust vacuum using the regulator or control buttons. – Confirm the setting using the gauge/digital display (units vary; commonly mmHg or kPa). – Some facilities standardize a default starting setting for each room, with clinician adjustment as needed per protocol.
Perform a functional suction check – Briefly occlude the patient-side line to confirm the device reaches and holds the selected vacuum. – Release occlusion and confirm the vacuum drops appropriately, indicating the system is responsive. – If the gauge rises slowly, that can suggest a leak, a loose lid, or a filter/tubing restriction.
Use during the procedure – Apply suction as required through the endoscope control valve or accessory. – Monitor canister fill level, tubing patency, and any alarms. – If suction performance drops, consider the “system chain” (endoscope channel → patient tubing → canister → lid/float → filter → pump) when troubleshooting.
Shutdown and post-case handling – Turn off the pump per IFU. – Clamp/cap lines as required by local infection control practice. – Dispose of waste and single-use components per facility policy. – Allow vacuum to dissipate before opening or removing components to reduce splash/aerosol risk.

In high-volume units, it can be helpful to define a standard approach for mid-case canister changes (if needed): who calls it, who clamps/holds the patient line, where the replacement canister is stored, and how contaminated surfaces are managed. Even simple role clarity can prevent spills and delays.

Calibration and verification (if relevant)

Some models rely on internal sensors or digital regulation. Calibration practices vary by manufacturer, but commonly fall into:

Operator verification: quick pre-use functional checks and leak checks.
Biomedical verification: periodic vacuum accuracy checks, alarm tests, and electrical safety testing as part of PM.

If the device displays persistent error codes, unusual vacuum readings, or unstable performance, do not attempt “calibration” beyond the IFU; escalate to biomedical engineering.

From a biomedical engineering standpoint, PM activities for suction pumps often include:

Vacuum accuracy confirmation against a calibrated reference gauge (where applicable)
Flow performance checks (recognizing that long tubing and filters affect real-world flow)
Leak tests across the canister/lid interface and vacuum tubing connections
Alarm verification (overflow, occlusion/leak, overheat, battery low) depending on model
Inspection of internal/external filters (intake filters, exhaust filters, mufflers) if the model uses them
Battery health checks on portable units (run-time verification and replacement planning)

Documenting these checks in an asset management system helps identify early trends (for example, a specific model family requiring more frequent seal replacements).

Typical settings and what they generally mean

Settings are highly model- and procedure-dependent, so avoid assuming a universal target. In general terms:

Lower vacuum is typically used when gentle aspiration is desired or when minimizing mucosal “grab” is a concern (clinical technique and policy dependent).
Higher vacuum may be used for thicker fluids or higher aspiration demand, but can increase the risk of sudden tissue adherence if applied directly.
Continuous vs. intermittent suction: some pumps support modes or footswitch control, but many clinical workflows rely on intermittent suction via the endoscope valve. Availability varies by manufacturer.

A useful operational distinction is:

Vacuum (negative pressure) is what the gauge usually shows.
Flow is what clears the field quickly.

A system can show “high vacuum” on the gauge while still delivering poor clearing performance if flow is restricted (blocked tubing, saturated filter, narrow connectors, long tubing, or an obstructed endoscope channel). For endoscopy teams, focusing only on the gauge can be misleading; flow-limiting points often matter more.

Operationally, teams should aim for the lowest effective suction consistent with local protocols, while maintaining a stable, leak-free system.

How do I keep the patient safe?

Patient safety with an Endoscopy suction pump is a combined outcome of correct setup, appropriate suction application, reliable alarm response, and disciplined infection control. The points below are general safety practices, not clinical directives.

In practice, suction-related safety issues tend to fall into a few categories: unintended tissue trauma from uncontrolled suction, delays due to equipment failure, contamination from leaks/spills, and environmental risks (trip hazards, electrical hazards). A strong safety approach addresses each category with training, standardized setup, and clear escalation steps.

Safety practices and monitoring (general)

Confirm correct line routing: wrong-port connections can lead to loss of suction or unintended aspiration pathways.
Use controlled suction application: prolonged, unbroken suction against tissue can cause trauma; techniques and limits should follow training and protocol.
Maintain visibility of the canister: a full canister can trigger overflow protection, reduce suction, and create spill risk.
Coordinate with the procedure team: suction demand may change quickly during irrigation, bleeding, or secretion management; clear communication reduces rushed adjustments.
Prevent sudden loss of suction: secure tubing to avoid accidental disconnection when moving the endoscope or patient.

Additional patient-safety-supporting practices include:

Use one patient per disposable suction pathway (tubing/liners/filters) per policy; do not “carry over” partially used consumables between patients.
Avoid placing heavy items on tubing (scope processors, footstools) that can silently occlude suction until urgently needed.
Keep a spare suction line ready in high-risk rooms when policy permits, so the team can switch rapidly if a line becomes blocked.
Confirm that accessories used to connect to the endoscope are approved and fit securely; loose adapters can create leaks and intermittent suction.

Alarm handling and human factors

Alarms are only protective if teams recognize and respond consistently.

Train on alarm meanings: “occlusion,” “overflow,” “filter blocked,” “low vacuum/leak,” and “overheat” are common categories (exact labels vary by manufacturer).
Avoid alarm fatigue: frequent nuisance alarms often indicate a system problem (kinked tubing, saturated filter, poorly seated lid) that should be fixed rather than repeatedly silenced.
Standardize setup: using a consistent tubing layout and a pre-use checklist reduces variability between staff and shifts.
Design for safety: procurement teams can specify carts, holders, and line management to minimize trip hazards and accidental disconnection.

Human factors that frequently influence alarm response include room noise, staff turnover, and role ambiguity (“who owns the pump?”). Some departments address this by defining a simple response pattern:

Immediate check (canister level, tubing kinks, disconnection)
Rapid correction (replace filter/liner if indicated by policy)
Escalation (switch to backup suction, call biomed, tag device)

Follow facility protocols and manufacturer guidance

A suction pump is hospital equipment that sits at the intersection of clinical care and engineering controls. For safe use:

Follow the manufacturer IFU for accessories, filters, canisters, and maintenance intervals.
Follow facility infection control policy for suction waste, PPE, and environmental cleaning.
Use a risk-based approach for backup suction availability, especially in high-acuity procedures or settings where power interruptions are plausible.

Facilities may also include suction pumps in broader safety programs such as electrical safety testing schedules, equipment commissioning for new rooms, and periodic mock downtime drills (for example, “what happens if suction stops mid-procedure?”). Those efforts are operational rather than clinical, and they can reduce both patient risk and staff stress.

How do I interpret the output?

Unlike monitoring devices that generate clinical measurements, an Endoscopy suction pump mainly provides equipment status outputs. Correct interpretation helps teams distinguish between normal variation and a failure that needs immediate action.

Types of outputs/readings

Common outputs include:

Vacuum level (analog gauge or digital value), typically in mmHg or kPa
Mode indicators (continuous/intermittent/standby), if the model supports modes
Battery status on portable units (varies by manufacturer)
Canister fill visibility (visual assessment or sensor-based full indication, depending on design)
Alarm indicators (audible/visual), potentially with error codes

Some pumps also show separate setpoint vs actual vacuum values, which can be useful in diagnosing leaks or restrictions: a large gap between setpoint and actual may indicate the system cannot achieve the requested vacuum due to a leak, open port, or insufficient pump performance.

How clinicians and staff typically interpret them (general)

Stable vacuum at the selected setting usually indicates a sealed system and adequate pump function.
High vacuum reading but poor suction at the endoscope often suggests obstruction downstream (kinked tubing, blocked endoscope channel, saturated filter) rather than insufficient pump power.
Low vacuum despite a high setting commonly indicates a leak (loose lid, cracked canister, poor tubing fit) or a valve left open.

Additional patterns staff may observe include:

Vacuum “hunting” or oscillation (needle swings up and down) which can suggest intermittent leaks, a loose connection that shifts with movement, or a float valve partially engaging.
Slow ramp-up to vacuum during occlusion testing, often associated with small leaks at the canister lid or worn seals.
Sudden drop to near-zero vacuum when suction is applied, which can indicate a major leak or that the system is pulling room air through an unintended opening.

Common pitfalls and limitations

The gauge/display usually reflects vacuum at or near the pump/canister, not necessarily at the distal endoscope tip.
Thick fluids, long tubing, and filters can reduce effective flow without obvious changes in setpoint.
Overflow protection can reduce suction abruptly; if staff interpret this as “pump failure,” they may overlook a full canister or triggered shut-off.

Another limitation is unit familiarity: mmHg and kPa represent the same physical concept but can confuse staff rotating across rooms or facilities. Many departments reduce this risk by standardizing models (where possible) or providing quick-reference labels that identify the usual operating range per local protocol.

What if something goes wrong?

A structured troubleshooting approach reduces downtime and prevents unsafe “workarounds.” The checklist below is general; follow the IFU and your facility’s escalation pathway.

A best practice is to separate actions into:

Immediate, case-supporting actions (restore suction safely, switch to backup)
Containment actions (prevent contamination, prevent reuse of a suspect device)
Follow-up actions (document, report, repair)

Troubleshooting checklist (operator level)

If the pump will not power on:

Confirm the outlet is live and the plug is fully seated.
Check the power switch position and any external fuses/reset (varies by manufacturer).
If portable, verify battery charge and that the battery is correctly installed (varies by model).
If there is any burning smell, smoke, or sparking, stop and isolate the device.

Additional quick checks can include:

Confirm any power-cord retention (if present) has not loosened during cart movement.
Check whether the pump is connected to a switched outlet that may have been turned off with other equipment.
If the device has an over-temperature lockout, allow it to cool per IFU before retrying (do not force repeated restarts).

If the pump runs but there is no suction:

Check that the canister lid is fully seated and correctly aligned.
Confirm tubing is connected to the correct ports (vacuum vs. patient port).
Verify the filter is not saturated and is installed in the correct direction (if directional).
Check whether overflow shut-off has engaged due to a full canister or fluid in the lid mechanism.

Also consider:

Ensure any unused ports on the lid are capped/closed; an open port can act like a large leak.
Inspect the vacuum tubing for small splits near connectors, which can be hard to see but can significantly reduce suction.
Confirm that the patient-side suction control (endoscope valve or accessory) is assembled correctly; a missing or mis-seated valve component can prevent effective suction.

If suction is weak or inconsistent:

Look for kinks, pinched tubing, or partially disconnected fittings.
Inspect for blockage in patient-side tubing or the endoscope suction channel (handled per local endoscopy protocol).
Replace single-use tubing or filter if resistance is suspected and replacement is permitted by policy.
Confirm the vacuum setting has not been inadvertently reduced.

Additional checks that often resolve “intermittent” issues:

Ensure the canister is not nearly full, where fluid turbulence may intermittently trigger the float mechanism.
Check for condensation or fluid in the filter; once a hydrophobic filter becomes wet, resistance can rise sharply.
Verify that connectors are the correct diameter; mixed-brand tubing can fit “almost” correctly and leak under movement.

If alarms activate:

Treat alarms as actionable: check canister fill, filter condition, occlusions, and leaks.
Note any error code for biomedical engineering and service reporting.

A simple documentation habit—writing down the alarm code and what was found (full canister, wet filter, kinked line)—can significantly speed up service diagnosis and trend analysis.

When to stop use immediately

Stop using the Endoscopy suction pump and switch to an approved backup suction method (per facility policy) if:

There is evidence of fluid ingress into the pump or contamination beyond the collection system
Electrical safety is questionable (shock sensation, damaged insulation, abnormal heat, smoke)
The device cannot maintain suction and is compromising procedural workflow
Repeated alarms persist despite basic corrective actions

Other red flags that warrant immediate stop and isolation include unusual vibration, repeated tripping of electrical protection devices in the room, or any sign that the pump housing has been compromised (cracks, missing screws, liquid inside display windows).

When to escalate to biomedical engineering or the manufacturer

Escalate when:

The same fault recurs across cases or rooms (suggesting systemic failure or accessory mismatch)
Preventive maintenance is overdue or the device fails a functional verification test
The pump shows sensor errors, software faults, or calibration/accuracy concerns
Replacement parts, filters, or canisters are not fitting reliably (possible compatibility issue)

For procurement leaders, recurring issues should trigger a review of accessory standardization, service response times, and whether the current device model matches the unit’s workload and environmental constraints.

Operationally, escalation is smoother when the endoscopy unit has a clear “tag and quarantine” process: label the device as out of service, remove consumables safely, record the fault, and store it in a designated area to avoid accidental reuse.

Infection control and cleaning of Endoscopy suction pump

Infection prevention for an Endoscopy suction pump focuses on two areas: the suction pathway (tubing, canister/liner, lid, filters) and external surfaces (high-touch points). Cleaning responsibilities should be clearly assigned and documented.

Because suction pumps interact with potentially infectious fluids, small lapses (reusing a wet filter, leaving residue on a lid seal, failing to disinfect a control panel) can create both contamination risk and performance problems. Infection control and reliability are closely linked: dirty seals leak, wet filters restrict flow, and overfilled canisters trigger shut-offs.

Cleaning principles (general)

Treat suction waste as potentially infectious and handle per facility policy and local regulations.
Use a closed collection approach where possible (canister with secure lid and appropriate filtration).
Clean first, then disinfect: organic material reduces disinfectant effectiveness.
Avoid introducing liquids into the pump housing unless the IFU explicitly permits it.

Additional practical principles include:

Minimize manipulation of liquid waste: sealed liner systems often reduce splash risk compared with pouring from reusable jars (where permitted by policy).
Separate clean and dirty zones on carts and counters to prevent cross-contamination of unused consumables.
Replace compromised components (cloudy canisters, cracked lids, hardened gaskets) promptly; “almost sealing” is not sealing.

Disinfection vs. sterilization (general)

Cleaning removes visible soil and reduces bioburden.
Disinfection (low/intermediate/high level) reduces microorganisms on surfaces and components, depending on product and contact risk.
Sterilization is intended to eliminate all microbial life and is usually reserved for instruments and accessories that contact sterile tissue or must meet sterile requirements.

For suction pumps, external surfaces are commonly disinfected with approved wipes, while patient-contact pathway items are typically single-use consumables or reprocessed according to their own IFU. Requirements vary by manufacturer and by the specific accessory.

In many endoscopy programs, the safest simplification is to treat the entire suction pathway (tubing/liner/filter) as single-use where feasible and allowed by policy, while maintaining reusable canister holders and pump surfaces through routine disinfection.

High-touch points to prioritize

Common high-touch areas include:

Power button and control knobs/buttons
Carry handle and cart contact points
Canister holder/bracket and lid latches
Display screen and alarm mute button
Footswitch (if used) and its cable
Power cord plug area and strain relief

Don’t overlook “hidden” touch points like the back handle used for moving the cart, the underside of the canister bracket, and the cable hooks that staff use to wrap cords between cases.

Example cleaning workflow (non-brand-specific)

PPE and preparation – Wear PPE per policy (gloves minimum; eye/face protection as required). – Ensure the pump is turned off and unplugged if the IFU recommends unplugging for cleaning.
Waste handling – Seal and dispose of liner/tubing per local clinical waste procedures. – If using a reusable canister, transport it in a manner that prevents spillage.
Accessory replacement – Replace single-use filters and tubing as required. – Inspect lid seals and ports for residue or damage.
External cleaning and disinfection – Wipe the device exterior with an approved disinfectant compatible with the materials. – Pay attention to crevices around controls and canister mounts. – Prevent fluid from entering vents or electrical connectors.
Drying and readiness – Allow surfaces to remain wet for the disinfectant’s required contact time (per product instructions). – Ensure the device is dry before returning to service.
Documentation – Record cleaning completion and any defects (cracks, missing parts, repeated contamination) for follow-up.

A strong infection control program also audits consumable availability: shortages of liners or filters can lead to unsafe improvisation, especially in high-volume endoscopy units.

Some facilities also implement periodic “deep clean” checks (for example, weekly): verify vents are dust-free, inspect cart casters, check cable integrity, and confirm that the canister holder remains secure. These actions are not a substitute for PM, but they can reduce avoidable failures and improve readiness.

Medical Device Companies & OEMs

In the medical device industry, the brand on the front panel is not always the same entity that designs or manufactures every component. Understanding manufacturer and OEM relationships helps buyers assess quality systems, service pathways, and accountability.

This topic matters because suction pumps, while mechanically straightforward compared with complex imaging systems, still depend on a chain of quality-controlled parts (motors, valves, sensors, housings, filters). When devices are rebranded or private-labeled, clarity on who controls design changes, spare parts, and post-market surveillance becomes a practical risk-management issue.

Manufacturer vs. OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer)

A manufacturer is the company responsible for placing the clinical device on the market under its name and meeting regulatory obligations (exact responsibilities vary by jurisdiction).
An OEM may design and/or produce the underlying product or subassemblies that another company sells under its own brand.

OEM relationships can be entirely appropriate and common in hospital equipment. The operational impact is that warranty handling, spare parts availability, software updates, and field service training may depend on how the branded company structures support with its OEM partners.

Practical procurement questions include:

Who holds the regulatory clearance/registration for the specific model in your country?
Who provides the IFU, approved accessories list, and service manual access (if permitted)?
Is service provided by the manufacturer, an authorized service partner, or the OEM?
Are critical consumables (filters, liners, canisters) proprietary or widely compatible?

Additional questions that help avoid long-term surprises include:

What is the expected service life and the manufacturer’s typical parts availability period after end-of-sale?
How are field safety notices and recalls communicated, and who is responsible for executing them locally?
Are there change-control notifications when consumables are updated (new filter design, new lid) that could affect compatibility?
If the unit includes software/digital controls, what is the approach to firmware updates and error-code support?

Top 5 World Best Medical Device Companies / Manufacturers

The companies below are example industry leaders (not a ranked list and not specific endorsements). Product availability and portfolio coverage for suction pumps vary by manufacturer and region.

Olympus – Widely associated with endoscopy platforms and related procedure-room equipment in many markets.
– Known for broad portfolios around visualization and endoscopic workflows, supported by training and service infrastructures in multiple regions.
– Specific Endoscopy suction pump offerings and configurations vary by manufacturer and country.
FUJIFILM – Active in endoscopy and imaging-related medical equipment in many geographies.
– Often positioned around integrated endoscopy systems and clinical workflow solutions, with regional service networks.
– Accessory compatibility and local product availability vary by market authorization.
KARL STORZ – Recognized for endoscopic instruments and visualization systems used in operating rooms and specialty endoscopy.
– Typically associated with surgical endoscopy environments that prioritize durability and service support.
– Suction solutions may be offered directly or via system integration, depending on region and product line.
Stryker – Known for surgical technologies and hospital equipment across multiple categories, including operating room integration in many markets.
– Frequently present in minimally invasive and visualization ecosystems where suction is part of a broader equipment stack.
– Availability of dedicated suction devices and configurations varies by manufacturer and local portfolio.
Medtronic – A diversified global medical device company with a broad footprint across surgical and interventional specialties.
– Often involved in procedure-room ecosystems where suction may be integrated with other devices and consumables.
– Specific suction pump products may not be publicly emphasized in all regions; availability varies by manufacturer and market.

It’s also worth noting that many regions rely heavily on specialist suction and fluid-management manufacturers (including strong domestic brands) that may not have the same global visibility as the companies above, but can offer excellent service coverage, competitive consumable ecosystems, and strong value for high-volume endoscopy units.

Vendors, Suppliers, and Distributors

Healthcare supply chains use overlapping terms that can affect pricing, warranty, and service accountability. For capital medical equipment like an Endoscopy suction pump, buyers should clarify roles in writing.

In many markets, the distributor is effectively the operational face of the brand: they provide installation, in-servicing, consumable supply, and first-line troubleshooting. That makes distributor capability a major determinant of uptime—sometimes more than the device’s specification sheet.

Role differences: vendor vs. supplier vs. distributor

A vendor is the party you purchase from (often responsible for quoting, contracting, and invoicing).
A supplier is a broader term for an organization that provides goods or services; it may be the manufacturer, distributor, or a reseller.
A distributor typically stocks inventory, manages logistics, and may provide technical support, installation, and first-line service coordination—often under authorization from the manufacturer.

For risk management and compliance, procurement teams commonly verify:

Authorized distribution status (where applicable)
Warranty start date and terms
Spare parts availability and service lead times
Consumable supply continuity (filters, canisters, liners, tubing)
Traceability expectations (lot/serial tracking as required locally)

Additional contracting and support points that reduce downtime include:

Installation and commissioning scope (who performs acceptance testing and documents it)
Service-level expectations (response time, on-site time, availability of loaner units)
Training commitments (initial training, refresher training, onboarding new staff)
Consumable stocking plans (minimum stock levels, lead times, and substitute approvals)

Top 5 World Best Vendors / Suppliers / Distributors

The organizations below are example global distributors (not a ranked list and not endorsements). Coverage outside primary markets varies, and endoscopy equipment is often handled by specialized regional distributors.

McKesson – A large healthcare distribution organization with strong logistics capabilities in its primary markets.
– Typically serves hospitals and health systems with broad medical-surgical supply needs alongside other categories.
– For specialized endoscopy capital equipment, purchasing may route through dedicated divisions or local partners (varies by country).
Cardinal Health – Known for distribution and supply chain services supporting hospitals, clinics, and surgery centers.
– Often provides contracting support, inventory management, and standardized purchasing pathways.
– Availability of specific endoscopy equipment lines depends on local portfolio and manufacturer agreements.
Medline Industries – A major supplier of medical-surgical products, including a wide range of consumables relevant to procedure rooms.
– Many buyers leverage such distributors for standardization of tubing, suction liners, and infection control supplies (product categories vary).
– Capital equipment offerings and regional reach vary by market structure.
Owens & Minor – Provides logistics and supply chain services that can support hospital operations and procurement workflows.
– Often involved in distribution and inventory programs where uptime depends on predictable consumable replenishment.
– Local availability of endoscopy-specific equipment varies by region and contracting model.
Henry Schein – A distributor with a history in practice-based procurement and supply support, with varying presence across healthcare segments by country.
– Can be relevant for ambulatory and clinic buyers depending on regional operations and product lines.
– Specialized endoscopy equipment procurement may still require local authorized distributors; arrangements vary.

Global Market Snapshot by Country

India

Demand for Endoscopy suction pump units is closely linked to expansion of private hospital chains, growth in day-care procedures, and increasing endoscopy volumes in metropolitan centers. Import dependence remains significant for many branded systems, while local assembly and multi-brand distribution are common in price-sensitive segments. Service quality often varies between tier-1 cities (stronger coverage) and smaller towns where biomedical support and spare parts access can be less predictable. Power quality and grounding practices can also vary between sites, so buyers frequently consider electrical robustness, surge protection practices, and availability of local technicians during evaluation.

China

China’s market is shaped by large-scale hospital infrastructure investment, procurement centralization in many provinces, and a strong push toward domestic manufacturing of medical equipment. Endoscopy capacity is expanding in major urban hospitals, while rural access can lag due to workforce and equipment constraints. Buyers commonly evaluate local service capacity and compatibility with hospital procurement platforms, with product availability influenced by registration status and tender dynamics. Price pressure in tender processes can be significant, which increases the importance of clear consumable pricing, documented compatibility, and long-term parts support.

United States

In the United States, demand is supported by high procedural volumes in hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers, plus strong expectations for documentation, infection prevention, and preventive maintenance. Many facilities emphasize total cost of ownership: consumables, service contracts, and downtime risk. Distribution and service networks are mature, but purchasing pathways may be complex due to group purchasing organizations (GPOs) and multi-site standardization requirements. Facilities may also prioritize clear device labeling, standardized alarm behavior, and straightforward cleaning compatibility to support compliance audits and reduce variability across sites.

Indonesia

Indonesia’s market reflects growing private healthcare investment in major cities and ongoing efforts to strengthen referral hospitals. Many facilities rely on imported endoscopy equipment, making procurement sensitive to exchange rates and shipping lead times. Service ecosystem strength varies widely: urban centers may have better authorized support, while remote islands can face longer repair turnaround and limited access to consumables. Logistics across archipelagic regions can make it valuable to stock critical liners/filters locally and to choose devices with simple, robust accessory ecosystems.

Pakistan

Demand is concentrated in larger cities where tertiary care hospitals and private diagnostic centers expand endoscopy services. Import reliance is common, and procurement teams often weigh affordability against service reliability and parts availability. Rural access and biomedical support can be limited, making ruggedness, ease of maintenance, and local distributor capability important selection factors. Facilities may also prefer models with readily available, non-proprietary consumables when supply continuity is uncertain.

Nigeria

Nigeria’s demand is driven by urban private hospitals, teaching hospitals, and medical tourism competition within the region, but constrained by funding cycles and import logistics. Many facilities depend on imported hospital equipment and may face challenges with preventive maintenance coverage and spare parts availability. The service ecosystem is often strongest in major cities, while rural access can be limited by infrastructure and workforce capacity. Power stability considerations (generators, voltage variation) can influence preferences for devices that tolerate fluctuations or have clear guidance on safe electrical operation.

Brazil

Brazil has established endoscopy services in major urban centers and a mixed public-private healthcare environment that influences purchasing cycles. Import dependence exists for many premium endoscopy systems, while local distribution and compliance requirements shape lead times and pricing. Service coverage can be robust in large states and capitals, with variability in smaller municipalities depending on distributor footprint. Buyers may place additional emphasis on documentation quality, Portuguese-language support, and predictable consumable supply across a geographically large market.

Bangladesh

Bangladesh’s market is expanding with growth in private hospitals and diagnostic centers, particularly in major cities. Imported medical equipment is common, and buyers often balance upfront cost with long-term consumable availability and service response time. Outside urban hubs, access to trained technicians and reliable spare parts can be a key limiting factor for equipment uptime. In some settings, procurement teams plan for on-site spare consumables and basic accessory kits to reduce downtime caused by simple missing components.

Russia

Russia’s demand is influenced by public procurement, large regional hospital networks, and local manufacturing initiatives in some medical device categories. Import pathways and availability of international brands can vary with regulatory and trade conditions. Service support is typically stronger in major cities, while remote regions may require careful planning for spare parts stocking and preventive maintenance scheduling. Large geographic distances can make remote technical support, clear error-code documentation, and distributor warehousing strategy more important than in smaller markets.

Mexico

Mexico’s market combines public hospital demand with strong private sector growth in urban areas and medical tourism hubs. Many endoscopy systems and related devices are imported, with distribution networks that vary by region. Service availability is generally better in large cities, and procurement teams often prioritize warranty clarity, parts lead time, and bilingual technical documentation. Standardizing consumables across multi-site private networks can be a key driver for vendor selection.

Ethiopia

Ethiopia’s demand is shaped by investment in tertiary hospitals and donor-supported healthcare projects, with ongoing needs for endoscopy capacity building. Imported equipment is common, and procurement frequently focuses on robustness, training, and availability of consumables. Service ecosystems can be limited outside the capital, making local partner capability and simplified maintenance plans important. Programs may also consider training-of-trainers models so local staff can sustain routine readiness checks and basic troubleshooting.

Japan

Japan has high expectations for equipment quality, documentation, and preventive maintenance, supported by a mature endoscopy ecosystem and strong clinical demand. Procurement is influenced by hospital system standards and long-term service planning, often with close vendor support. Access is generally strong in urban and regional centers, though smaller facilities may still prioritize compact designs and reliable consumable supply. Standardization and detailed documentation practices can drive preference for devices with consistent performance specifications and well-defined accessory compatibility.

Philippines

In the Philippines, demand is concentrated in Metro Manila and other large cities where private hospitals and specialty centers invest in endoscopy suites. Import dependence is common, and procurement timelines can be affected by shipping, customs, and distributor stocking strategies. Service coverage can be variable across islands, so buyers often evaluate remote support capability and parts availability. Some facilities mitigate geographic challenges by maintaining buffer stock of filters/liners and selecting models with straightforward, locally supported consumables.

Egypt

Egypt’s market is driven by large public hospitals, a growing private sector, and increasing procedural volumes in major cities. Many endoscopy-related devices are imported, with purchasing shaped by tender processes and distributor relationships. Service coverage and training support are often stronger in Cairo and Alexandria than in more remote governorates. Buyers may also consider how rapidly consumables can be replenished during currency fluctuations or import delays, to avoid workflow disruptions.

Democratic Republic of the Congo

Demand is concentrated in major cities and often supported by private providers, NGOs, and referral hospitals. Import reliance is high, and supply chain constraints can make consumables and spare parts difficult to source consistently. Service infrastructure may be limited, so durable designs, clear maintenance routines, and strong local partner support are critical for sustainable use. Facilities may also prioritize pumps that are easy to operate and maintain with limited technical resources and that can be supported through practical training.

Vietnam

Vietnam’s market is expanding with hospital modernization, growing private healthcare, and increasing demand for minimally invasive diagnostics and therapy. Many facilities still rely on imported medical equipment, though local distribution networks are strengthening. Urban centers typically have better service and training access, while rural hospitals may face longer downtime without robust support agreements. As more hospitals expand endoscopy capacity, standardization of consumables and predictable service response times are becoming increasingly important selection criteria.

Iran

Iran has significant clinical demand and a mix of local production and imports across medical equipment categories, with procurement influenced by regulatory and trade conditions. Availability of specific international brands and spare parts can vary, making service planning and compatibility checks essential. Larger urban hospitals generally have better biomedical capacity than smaller facilities, affecting equipment uptime. In such conditions, clear documentation, robust accessory availability, and the ability to maintain devices with locally available parts can become central to procurement decisions.

Turkey

Turkey’s market benefits from a strong hospital sector, a large private healthcare presence, and regional medical tourism in certain cities. Procurement can include both imported and locally supplied hospital equipment, with an emphasis on cost control and service coverage. Access to trained technicians is typically better in major cities, while regional facilities may require stronger service-level agreements. Buyers often weigh not only device specifications but also training availability and distributor capability to support multi-site networks.

Germany

Germany’s market is characterized by structured procurement, rigorous compliance expectations, and strong emphasis on documentation, safety testing, and preventive maintenance. Demand for endoscopy support devices aligns with high procedural volumes and well-developed clinical pathways. Service ecosystems are mature, but buyers still scrutinize consumable costs and interoperability with existing endoscopy towers and workflow standards. Facilities may also expect detailed technical documentation and clear cleaning compatibility guidance to align with internal hygiene programs.

Thailand

Thailand’s demand reflects expansion of private hospitals, strong urban tertiary care, and medical tourism, alongside ongoing investment in public facilities. Many endoscopy systems and related devices are imported, supported by regional distributor networks. Service and training are generally strongest in Bangkok and major provincial cities, with smaller facilities prioritizing reliability and simplified maintenance. Procurement teams in tourism-driven hospitals may also emphasize redundancy planning and quick service turnaround to protect scheduled procedure volumes.

Key Takeaways and Practical Checklist for Endoscopy suction pump

Confirm the Endoscopy suction pump is used only within its IFU.
Standardize one accessory set to reduce leaks and compatibility errors.
Keep a documented pre-use checklist in every endoscopy room.
Verify preventive maintenance status before the start of each list.
Perform a quick occlusion test to confirm the system reaches set vacuum.
Route tubing to avoid kinks, pinching, and accidental disconnection.
Keep the collection canister visible to the operator during procedures.
Replace single-use filters per policy; wet filters can reduce flow.
Treat frequent nuisance alarms as a fixable system problem.
Train staff to distinguish “low vacuum/leak” from “occlusion” conditions.
Use the lowest effective suction level per facility protocol.
Avoid improvised connectors that can compromise seal integrity.
Stock critical consumables (liners, canisters, filters) to prevent workarounds.
Define a clear backup suction plan for every procedure room.
Manage cables and cords to reduce trip hazards around the procedure table.
Prevent fluid from entering device vents during cleaning.
Disinfect high-touch points after each case per infection control policy.
Assign ownership for external cleaning vs. suction pathway disposal.
Document canister/liner disposal as clinical waste per local regulations.
Investigate recurring canister overflow events for process gaps.
Escalate repeated faults early to biomedical engineering.
Record error codes and alarm conditions to support service diagnosis.
Avoid using unapproved third-party tubing without compatibility checks.
Include suction performance in commissioning tests for new rooms.
Consider power stability and battery needs when buying portable units.
Evaluate noise and heat output for staff comfort and room suitability.
Ensure the pump is positioned to avoid tipping during patient transfers.
Confirm warranty terms and local service coverage before purchase.
Verify spare parts availability and typical lead times during tendering.
Build total cost of ownership models including disposables and service.
Track downtime and repair frequency as part of asset management.
Provide role-based training for nurses, techs, and reprocessing staff.
Use incident reporting for spills, suspected contamination, or device failures.
Avoid continued use if there is evidence of fluid ingress into the pump.
Store the pump in a clean, dry area with protected ports between cases.
Keep a spare canister/liner ready for high-volume or irrigation-heavy lists.
Review alarm settings and audibility in noisy procedure environments.
Use authorized service partners where required by local regulation.
Integrate suction pump checks into endoscopy room turnover workflow.
Confirm local language IFUs and labels are available for staff reference.
Include suction accessories in standard procedure packs where practical.
Audit cleaning compliance on footswitches and control panels regularly.
Align procurement, clinical leadership, and biomed on device standardization.
Reassess pump specifications if procedure volumes or case mix changes.
Plan for end-of-life replacement and parts obsolescence proactively.
Keep service contact details accessible in the endoscopy unit.
Label suction tubing pathways (where permitted) to reduce wrong-port connections during fast turnovers.
Quarantine and tag devices involved in spills or suspected contamination until they are assessed per policy.
Maintain a small “suction rescue kit” (approved spare filter, tubing, caps) in each room to reduce mid-case delays.
Include canister lid seal/gasket inspection in routine checks; small leaks can cause major performance loss.
Periodically review consumable utilization data to forecast peaks (for example, irrigation-heavy lists) and prevent shortages.

If you are looking for contributions and suggestion for this content please drop an email to info@mymedicplus.com

Best Cosmetic Hospitals, All in One Place