AIDS gains risk slipping away

AIDS & HIV

Source: politico.eu

HIV/AIDS has gone from a mysterious deadly illness to a manageable chronic disease. But a lot happened in the roughly four decades it took to get there. And, according to the American activist David Barr, there’s much that needs to be done to ensure the gains are not reversed.

Barr has seen almost everything in his 35 years of fighting the epidemic, from the early gatherings in the 1980s of the pioneering activist group ACT UP to the roll-out of treatments that saved millions of lives, including his own.

Looking back at his life’s work, and the seminal efforts in the United States that helped launch a global movement, Barr broke down the six stages of the battle against HIV/AIDS.

Fear 

To be gay in the 1980s was to be scared. There was a disease infecting your friends, and someday it might come for you, too — if it hadn’t already.

Lawyers around the U.S. were calling the Lambda Legal Defense Fund, where Barr was working, asking what they could do for clients who had been kicked out of doctor’s offices, thrown out of apartments, or fired.

There wasn’t much they could do. By 1985, the U.S. government had just licensed an antibody test that screened for HIV, the precursor to AIDS, which had already claimed thousands of lives in the U.S.

Lambda was advising the gay community not to take the test because there was nothing protecting people should they test positive. Texas had tried, after all, to pass a law forcing those who tested positive to be quarantined.

And what were you supposed to do if you tested positive anyway? That just meant you were afflicted by an illness for which there was no cure.

“And in the midst of all of it, our government wasn’t responding at all,” Barr said.

So the gay community developed their own legal responses, introduced education about how to keep from catching the disease, and put in place social work services. And they began to fight back.

Fight

In New York City in the late 1980s, Monday nights at the newly established AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power (ACT UP) meetings were the place to be. By the summer of 1987, hundreds of gay people made their way to take part.

“People were sick and dying all around us, constantly,” Barr said. “It felt like we were in a war zone.”

In a politically charged time, ACT UP was the angry activist group. Their first action was to protest the high price for the antiretroviral azidothymidine (AZT), the only treatment on the market for people living with HIV.

In October 1988, ACT UP took the fight to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in suburban Maryland, donning lab coats with their hands painted red with fake blood, demanding a government response. They wanted more studies on HIV/AIDS, and they wanted quicker access to possible treatments.

“That was really the demonstration where the national AIDS movement was born,” Barr said.

Drugs

As the camaraderie of the early years began to fray, Barr and other members of ACT UP broke off in 1991 to form their own group, Treatment Action Group (TAG), to begin a new phase of activism. Rather than fight the power, they’d try to harness it. “I didn’t need to take over the FDA,” Barr explained. “I needed to get into the room with FDA.”

In 1993, AIDS claimed around 40,000 lives in the U.S. alone.

That year, Barr and four other members of TAG protested a conference in Berlin, where a doctor planned to say that taking AZT and two other analogs, ddI or ddC, was effective for a particular group of people. Barr and his fellow activists stormed in to tell the crowd that her results were skewed, and the drugs were actually not effective at all. The group of five marched out to applause and the feeling of triumph.

“We had made our point,” he said.

But later, as they sat in a park, the reality of what that meant hit them: They were left without a cure. “We were the ones who were going to suffer from this,” he explained.

Turning point

The mid-1990s were a time of guarded optimism. Patients who had signed up for clinical trials and an expanded access program were taking what was informally known as the AIDS cocktail, and it seemed to be working: “People getting up from their deathbeds — literally,” Barr said.

The pills were difficult to take. Patients couldn’t miss a dose. The side effects could be harsh. But they were working. By 1996, antiretrovirals were available on the market for anyone with the virus — not just those in the expanded trials. The FDA, having recognized the urgency, was flagging new treatments for approval, with less data than was needed for any other group of drugs before it. That was the first year that death rates began to decline.

“There was certainly some elation,” Barr said. “But there was also this odd guilt, because why am I alive, and my friends aren’t? How did I get lucky, and they didn’t? There was no rhyme or reason to any of it.”

Global battle

The fight against HIV/AIDS went worldwide in the 2000s.

The momentum began at the XIII International AIDS Conference in Durban, South Africa in 2000, when activists in the country took their national fight to the global stage.

The Global Fund and the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), the two main revenue streams for HIV/AIDS funding, were put in place. The World Health Organization set a goal of getting 3 million people into treatment by 2005 — “a very ambitious target at the time.”

HIV/AIDS activists teamed up around the world. Some faced “much greater challenges” than in New York, and their collaborative work built momentum and help rake in money.

“We were making the right argument at the right time,” Barr said.

Fragile success

Barr says the fight has only gotten more difficult. Funding for HIV/AIDS has remained relatively flat. A 2019 report from the Kaiser Family Foundation and UNAIDS found that donor governments’ spending hasn’t changed much in the last year. Donors are also less inclined to give money for HIV-specific work.

Meanwhile, the number of people living with HIV continues to rise. “Every year you have a flat budget it’s like a cut,” Barr said.

U.N. member states signed up to 90-90-90 targets in 2014, pledging to ensure that by 2020, 90 percent of people with HIV will know their status, 90 percent of those diagnosed will be on antiretroviral therapies, and 90 percent of those receiving therapy will have succeeded in repressing the virus. But they have not come up with the money to make that happen.

Barr objects to how UNAIDS and PEPFAR frame their messaging. They claim “we’ll meet the targets, and we’ll end AIDS,” he said. “That’s not true.” Those starting treatment now will have to maintain it for decades. “Those bills are going to keep coming in,” he said.

Then there’s sex and drugs — as the fear subsides, a whole new generation is growing up now who has not learned the lessons from the 1980s and 1990s.

“The success we have made is remarkable,” Barr said, “but it’s incredibly fragile.”

“If the response is not sustained and maintained, we’re going to lose the tools we’ve miraculously been able to develop [over the decades],” Barr warned. “And then we’re back to 1986.”